2/9 The cornerstone of treatment is to treat the underlying cause. Everything else is just a 🩹. It can sometimes be very hard to treat the underlying cause immediately (assuming you can identify it).
3/9 Free water restriction is going to help (to a certain degree), but make sure that it’s feasible for the patient (they often need to do this beyond hospitalization). Consider restricting 500 cc below their 24-hour urine output:
4/9 But what about in the first 24 hours of hospitalization? I arbitrarily do 1-1.5L restriction. Remember that the food the patient receives also has free water (that is quite difficult to quantify).
5/9 Let’s move onto 🧂. What dose should you order? It depends on the following questions:
1️⃣ How low is the Na?
2️⃣ Are they at risk for volume overload?
2/9 You may think “well that’s nice, but my thyroid exam technique is not the best.” Don’t worry, the Stanford 25 has got your back (including this clinical pearl)! stanfordmedicine25.stanford.edu/the25/thyroid.…
3/9 Now that you’ve identified a goiter, you will probably end up ordering some lab and imaging studies. But don’t leave the bedside just yet! Let’s first break down the differential for an enlarged thyroid (thanks again to the Stanford 25).
2/7 Metered dose inhaler (MDIs) are best used with a spacer! Pressurized devices were invented far earlier, but the technology was adapted to treat asthma in the form of an MDI in 1957 by Riker Labs. smithsonianmag.com/innovation/his…
1/7 Let’s go over the evidence-based physical exam for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (LE DVT). In the spirit of quantifying clinical concern, here is a question - besides inspection (and #POCUS), which tool will help you the most?
Quick review of LRs:
- The (+) and (-) indicate the LR if a finding is present or absent, respectively
- The more the LR deviates from 1, the more useful it is
3/7 For this particular set of exam findings, it may be more helpful to see how much the LRs change your post-test probability (assuming a pre-test probability of 50%). The presence of absence of asymmetric calf swelling seems to be the most helpful.
1/4
Let's review the evidence-based physical exam for Cushing syndrome!
Quick review of LRs:
- The (+) and (-) indicate the LR if a finding is present or absent, respectively
- The more the LR deviates from 1, the more useful it is
2/4
Things that stand out to me
- "Buffalo hump" doesn't have a defined LRs despite being taught as a "classic" finding (occurs in 34-75% of patients)
- The presence of moon facies has a lower LR than I expected (1.6)
3/4 - The absence (or presence) of abdominal striae is not particularly helpful
- The presence of a thin skinfold (thickness on the back of the hand <1.8 mm in women of reproductive age) can be VERY telling
3/8 For a way to clinically interpret the LRs, let's turn our attention to Dr. McGee's book "Evidence-Based Physical Diagnosis." Although sunken eyes has the highest LR, notice how small the difference in increase in probability there is with each exam finding.
2/ What are the Weber and Rinne tests used to help identify?
3/ The answer is both! Remember that the most useful exams are hypothesis-driven so you need to do a history to begin suspecting if a patient has either type of hearing loss. This will help you generate a pre-test probability for disease (this will become relevant later).