Today’s #ResearchTip is keep a database when you’re trying to get people on board with your research. It’ll help keep track of who’s keen to join, who isn’t, and why.

#AcademicChatter #AcademicTwitter #AcademicMentalHealth #gradschool #PhDChat #PhDHelp #HigherEd
This database should be for the network you’re building to inform and advance your research. Keeping track of who you’re approaching, whether they’re interested or ready to join in, and in what capacity, helps track the time you’re spending and who is an ally or an obstruction.
It can be especially useful if you are needing to justify to supervisors, bosses or funders how long research is taking. It can also be a good way to track what you share (which can help if you fear other potential contacts are not reliable or trustworthy).
It can also help note if people want to join in what they can offer (availability, time commitments etc). Or where you are chasing people so you can note if they’re interested but busy, or fobbing you off. Or where they aren’t interested initially but become so later.
All of this is data. It’s telling the behind-the-scenes story of your research. It will later help you remember who were the people onside and enthusiastic from the start, who wanted to help but couldn’t, who was potentially a barrier or block to your research.
It also helps you avoid pestering people who aren’t interested, and to make the connection this usually isn’t personal.
Remember whatever records you keep to check data protection requirements and to be professional. Passing on contact info without consent, for example, not okay.
ps. If you’re supervising research that requires a student, colleague or assistant to build networks please ensure they have training and they are not pushed to waste time chasing up contacts who are clearly not going to join or support a study.
You may want to record why people don’t want to join in and how they react. There’s a big difference between “sorry I’m busy” versus a rude, extractive or dismissive refusal. In some cases supervisors may need to be alert to safeguarding their staff if network building is harmful
On one project I worked on I had to build a network of GPs who were interested in our area of study. Most were lovely and a few are still friends decades on. But some I was made to keep calling 20+ times and they were clearly uninterested. A minority were extremely hostile.
In that job it was a bullying environment with a lot of time wasted as we all tried to build networks with busy people,when senior staff could probably have managed sign up in a single call or letter. Record keeping for networks is important but so is a clear plan for invitations
When I wrote #CopingWithPregnancyLoss again I built networks and continue to do so with most people being wonderful and generous, who I hopefully can give back to. Some people were also very busy, understood. And a few were downright hostile, seeing me, wrongly, as a competitor.
One large charity in particular was extremely unpleasant and unprofessional. Perhaps forgetting they were not just discussing research but interacting with a grieving person who their remit was to care for. These observations, while sad, also explain so much of your research.
It’s important to note how building networks can be transformative but require management, respect and care. And if it is becoming draining or upsetting for you to do, seek support from those who *are* on your side.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Petra Boynton

Petra Boynton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrPetra

14 Aug
While incels are in the news again it’s important to remember
- concerns were raised about this over two decades ago
- Black women raised the alarm
- journalists were asked to address problems both documenting incels and their own poor sex and relationships writing, but avoided
Not just concerns about incels but worries about poor sex and relationships education, lack of parental supervision/awareness online, PUAs, g*mer**te, the far right and more, and all amalgamations of these.
Journalists may want to cover this now, because it’s “news” not recognising there’s a long history of growing problems and a legacy of many people who tried to raise concerns and in many cases were dismissed as killjoys and prudes (particularly in the early to mid noughties).
Read 29 tweets
11 Aug
If your teen is getting their #GCSEResults here's a list of pandemic-related #MentalHealth advice for them nostartoguideme.com/teenscoronavir…
and for you nostartoguideme.com/parentscoronav…
More support for #GCSEResultsDay
☎️ 0808 100 8000 @exam_helpline

@bbcbitesize guide to results day
bbc.co.uk/bitesize/artic…

@YoungMindsUK Dealing with disappointing results
youngminds.org.uk/young-person/c…

Childline's guide to getting exam results
childline.org.uk/get-involved/a…
#EduTwitter and #PastoralCare Twitter you may find the above helpful if any pupils are struggling on #GCSEResultsDay ⬆️
Read 4 tweets
11 Aug
While it’s not true of everyone in very senior academic roles, a large number of people in them have a parent or other relative who was also senior/well known who opened doors for them (and closed them for you).
It doesn’t mean they aren’t bright or don’t necessarily deserve their role, but they will have had all manner of lucky breaks you won’t have had. So it’s not your lack of ability or drive that’s blocking your progress. It’s a lack of relatives making a path for you.
In addition many senior academics are financially secure with a good support network. Stable housing (sometimes more than one home). These are also hidden benefits that make work much easier. You can thrive and progress if you’re not worried about the bills.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jun
Today’s #ResearchTip is opinions and ideas are interesting, but rigorous and scholarly practice requires you situate those ideas with existing research. It’s a skill many struggle with, so more in thread /1 #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #gradschool #HigherEd #MedEd #PhDChat
You may have experiences and perspectives you feel strongly about. Or see others discussing things you dis/agree with. Working in a university doesn’t magically make you more informed. Your ideas or observations need checking and exploring alongside research others have done /2
This doesn’t mean a cursory quick Google or looking in one academic search engine. It means identifying key words and search parameters and looking across disciplines. Then appraising, critiquing, reflecting and synthesising what you discover. How does it fit with your idea? /3
Read 14 tweets
24 Jun
In case this (or something like it) ever happens to you, editors should NOT send out reviews like this. Reviewers should be trained in competent, clear and respectful reviewing. Push back hard if you get something like this. #AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #PhDChat #gradschool
Criticisms that say work needs a do-over or re-starting need to explain why and how. No snark without solution. If it's just a 'you're terrible, go away and start again' remark it does not belong anywhere.
If you get a review like this you cite the COPE ethical guidelines for reviewers "be objective and constructive in their reviews, refraining from being hostile or inflammatory
and from making libellous or derogatory personal comments" publicationethics.org/files/Peer%20r…
Read 6 tweets
24 Jun
Today's #ResearchTip is be wary if using qualitative approaches and are encouraged to make your research "more reliable" by
- using a random sample
- converting qual data to numerical data
- incorporating quant approaches
#AcademicTwitter #AcademicChatter #PhDChat #HigherEd /1
I bore myself having to say this but we are decades beyond any qual vs quant debates, teaching qual in contrast to quant, implying qual methods are lesser to quant ones, or artificially forcing qual methods into quant approaches. Stop it already! /2
This #ResearchTip is prompted by seeing yet another example of someone being told to "improve" qual research by making it more quant (applying randomisation). If you're not expert in qual methods stop telling people how to do them and go learn yourself /3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(