Given recent events in #Afghanistan & my focus on that country since 2008, I’ve been engaging in a lot of professional reflection of late. I'm going to share some results of that in this (long) THREAD. 1/n
To do this, I went back and re-read everything I’ve written publicly on #Afghanistan over the past two years, as well as a few pertinent older pieces. I’ll post links to these articles as I go. 2/n
@WarOnTheRocks Key quote: the #ANDSF “are only capable of holding the line in areas absent of sig #Taliban pressure, where the coalition has maintain[ed] a steady advisory presence & where there are strong leaders...In areas where these aspects have been lacking, [they] are slowly failing” 4/n
@WarOnTheRocks In it, I highlighted an earlier assessment we @CNA_org had made in 2013: “if the US & NATO do not maintain a training & advisory mission in #Afghanistan, the absence of advisors…is likely to result in a downward spiral of [#ANDSF] capabilities—along with security." 6/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org I also said: “[the #ANDSF] have been steadily losing ground to the #Taliban, even w/substantial spt from the USMIL...it's likely they wouldn't be able to hold out militarily on their own for long…the resultant downward spiral would occur over the course of 6 mos to 2 yrs.” 7/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG In 2019, I discussed the costs of war & peace in #Afghanistan. Key point: While the US was bearing the brunt of $ costs for the war, Afghans bore the brunt of the human cost: I estimated the death toll for Afghans—including #Taliban—in 2019 would be ~17-25k (~45-70/day). 9/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG Key points here: 1) the failure of the 2nd & 3rd elements, & resultant heavy reliance on airstrikes & #SOF/Commando raids as a result; 2) the cautious embrace by Resolute Support--& the whole-hearted embrace by #Afghanistan's MOD--of body counts as a metric for "pressure." 11/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG These articles were “explainers” & “think-ahead” pieces. I didn’t offer much in the way of predictions, beyond noting the likely cont'd degradation of security in #Afghanistan & failing of the #ANDSF, trends that were borne out but that weren't hard for obj audiences to see. 12/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG I also argued that it should try to keep an advisory presence in place to stem the slow failing of the #ANDSF. The Biden plan was to keep 650 USMIL at the Embassy; they were to engage in at best a limited advisory capacity. 14/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog I offered 4 recommendations to the incoming Biden admin: 1) Prepare a compelling case that the #Taliban was not meeting its commitments in the US-TB Agreement & pause the timeline for completing the withdrawal of all US troops until such time as they did. 16/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog 4) Reform the #ANDSF to make them less dependent (“Part of the reason the #Taliban have been emboldened is that they see the US providing less support to the Afghan army & police & they believe these forces will collapse if & when the US leaves the country”) 18/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog I concluded: “None of these suggestions will be easy to implement, but they are nonetheless necessary to prevent a quick failure of US policy in #Afghanistan.” The Biden administration did only the 3rd of these. 19/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog@CTCWP To answer that, I did a net assessment across 4 tangible + 1 intangible factors: size, resources, external support, force employment & cohesion. I found that post-US withdrawal, the #Taliban would have a *slight* military advantage b/c of better strategy & stronger cohesion. 21/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog@CTCWP@RyanBaker51 “The fact that the USMIL provides logistical & other support to its allies & partner forces in #Afghanistan means that the pace & order of the withdrawal should account for the distinct requirements of these forces. This includes…Afghan forces..." 25/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog@CTCWP@RyanBaker51 "...who will likely be expected to take control of the bases & any residual equip the US & its NATO partners leave behind, & who will have to adjust their posture & operations to account for the departure of critical enabling capabilities such as advisers, air & fire spt..." 26/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog@CTCWP@RyanBaker51 "...& contracted maintainers & logisticians. Failure to account for the needs of these partner forces could lead to their collapse, which would increase the security risk to US personnel still in the country & have significant diplomatic & reputational costs.” 27/n
I compared the post-Soviet withdrawal experience w/what seemed would be the likely situation post-US withdrawal. It's worth dwelling on this a bit. 28/n thediplomat.com/2021/05/will-a…
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog@CTCWP@RyanBaker51 Notable quote: “scholar Thomas Barfield wrote, ‘It was universally believed that once the Soviets left, the mujahedin would overrun govt outposts, take regional cities & march on Kabul in a matter of months, if not weeks.’ & yet Najibullah held his govt together for 3 yrs...”29/n
@WarOnTheRocks@CNA_org@LaurelMillerICG@lawfareblog@CTCWP@RyanBaker51 In that vein, I noted: “At the time of Biden’s [withdrawal] announcement, there were a flurry of predictions that the #Taliban would move quickly to overrun govt outposts, seize regional cities & ignite a broader civil war or march on Kabul to topple the government..." 30/n
I’ve seen lots of discussion lately about #Taliban-captured weapons in #Afghanistan, much of which is ill-informed. So, I’m going to discuss five myths about this topic in this THREAD. 1/n
(Note: The format for this was inspired by this excellent “five myths about the #Taliban” article by @a_a_jackson that you should also read) 2/n
Myth 1: The #Taliban have captured $88 billion worth of weapons & equipment.
Not true. That number is (according to @SIGARHQ) the sum total of funding appropriated (not all of which was spent) for security reconstruction (mostly, the #ANDSF) since 2002. 3/n
There was a man, who developed a rash on his hand. It wasn’t debilitating, but he desired to be rid of it. So he went to a doctor.
The doctor prescribed a cream & told the man to apply it every day. 2/n
This the man did. The rash receded, but did not disappear. The man kept applying the cream. Some time later, the rash began to expand again. Slowly, but discernibly, it was growing. 3/n
I was asked today "what does the future hold for #Afghanistan?"
Rather than hazard a prediction, I went back to two of Colin Powell's questions for intel analysts: What's known? And what's unknown? 1/n
In regards to what's known, I'll assume you're familiar w/events of the last week & won't rehash it all. Suffice to say, we know the govt is in *serious trouble*
2/n
We also know that, despite what else they may say, western countries have concluded the collapse of Kabul is at least possible, if not probable & imminent
As an analyst, I do my best to look at the available data & devise analytic frameworks to organize & make logical & transparent sense of it. This is, however, not math. The answers aren't firm. There are no scientific laws on which to rely. Much has to be assumed. 1/n
I do my best to keep track of my assumptions, to revisit them, to test them, & to gauge the risk associated with them being wrong. In this case, I assumed the #ANDSF would recognize that its advantages were in defending the cities. That they could dig in around them. 2/n
That when the #Taliban massed to take cities, the AAF could decimate them from the air. I wasn't sure how long the #ANDSF could withstand a siege & repeated assaults on the cities, but I assumed it would at least be thru this year. Those assumptions now look like poor ones. 3/n
MR. KIRBY: I have seen lots of press reporting this morning about assessments coming out of #Afghanistan. I know you're all interested in that, let me tell you, I am not going to talk specifically about intelligence assessments one way or the other... 2/n
...We continue to monitor the situation in #Afghanistan closely. We are mindful of the deteriorating security situation. And our focus right now remains on supporting the Afghan forces in the field where and when feasible we can from the air, as well as completing ... 3/n
@PentagonPresSec Q: The air strikes that the U.S. has done thus far over the past three or four weeks with some regularity, how much difference have those air strikes made on the ground, in terms of the battlefield? 2/n
@PentagonPresSec & secondly, I'd like to ask you about @SecDef's thinking on this question about the utility of limited air strikes in #Afghanistan. So as you get to Aug 31st, what is his view about, do air strikes alone by the U.S. make a decisive – can they make a decisive difference? 3/n