We’ve now got the 3 main national parties’ climate platforms. (Greens haven’t got much on website, so will go with a 8/9 press release here and there.) How do they compare? Great that lots of detail, so 🧵will be long. Still can’t promise to cover everything. #cdnpoli #elxn44 /1
Cutting to the chase, Cons plan is better than in 2019, but Lib and NDP both promise much more ambitious policies and less support for fossil fuels. NDP builds on Lib initiatives, w tweaks, some important (fossil fuel subsidies). There’s a table to compare at end of 🧵! /2
TARGETS: Libs submitted new target of 40-45% below 2005 by 2030. Cons said they’ll meet “Canada’s Paris commitment” but that’s original -30% target. #ParisAgreement doesn't allow backtracking, so would mean going to #COP26 with a stated intention of non-compliance. NDP -50%. /3
Targets matter at COP, but need policies to meet. The Cons have a plan for -30%, but caveats could weaken it significantly. Lib platform goes beyond their -30% plan + spring $ announcements (transit, EV mftg), but is it enough for -40%? I'm more skeptical of NDP plan for -50%. 4
CARBON PRICING: Libs would increase to $170/tonne by 2030. Conservs are “prepared” to match $170 for industry (though with an escape clause), but offer $20-50/tonne “savings plan” gimmick for households. NDP “will continue with C pricing” but don’t specify price. Ditto Greens. /5
VEHICLES: Cons would mandate 30% ZEVs sales by 2030. Libs 50% by 2030, 100% by 2035. NDP 100% by 2035. Also, b/c it’s an election, $$ for voters - though not clear effective. Libs would extend prev $5k for EV purchase, NDP would waive GST, up to $15k if made-in-Canada (USMCA?). 6
OIL/GAS sector releases more GHGs than any other. Libs propose 5 yr caps for o/g on path to net zero in 2050, but no # even for 2025. Backgrounder yesterday says targets will be set on advice of Net Zero Advisory Body. That's good. Still big Q’s re: CCS, indiv company targets. /7
NDP proposes multi-yr sectoral carbon budgets, presumably including oil/gas. Also no #s though same goal of net zero in 2050. Conservs: “will treat the energy sector as the key driver of the economy that it is.” Lots in their plan about supporting oil/gas industry. /8
JUST TRANSITION: Libs promise $2B to support transition in AB, SK, NF, re-ups 2019 promise of JT legislation. Oddly I'm seeing less NDP focus on just transition than in 2019 – seeking anti-Kenney votes in AB? Speaks volumes that Cons anticipate job *shortages* in energy sector. 9
FOSSIL FUEL SUBSIDIES: Conservs “will make pipelines a priority,” more $$ for CCS. NDP would phase out all FF subsidies. Greens ditto. Libs silent on this one (they're building a pipeline for the oil industry after all) but now putting big $ and tax credits into low-C sectors. 10
ELECTRICITY: Liberals promise Clean Electricity Standard to achieve net zero electricity by 2035. NDP net zero by 2030, 100% renewable (i.e., no offsets) by 2040. Conservatives nothing that I caught. Greens call for 100% renewables, but offer no deadline. /11
OTHER STUFF: Cons would mandate 15% renewable gas and stricter clean fuel std by 2030, both likely more costly than the C tax they replace. Libs would further reduce methane, end thermal coal exports by 2030. NDP puts more emphasis on Indigenous rights, environmental justice. /12
BUILDINGS: Also very important because they last so long. We need to build better and retrofit pretty much the rest by 2050. Lots in there too but I’ve run out of steam, and know less about the building side. Building folks please chime in! 13
My attempt to summarize! I’ll update if corrections are needed or as more comes out in the campaign. The urgency of action is clear. What we do on climate matters more than ever in #Elxn44. I hope all voters will weigh the parties' climate plans seriously.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Kathryn Harrison

Kathryn Harrison Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfKHarrison

12 Sep
One last comparison of the parties’ #climate plans in #elxn44! This time updates based on LPC and NDP platform costing. As with original thread (pasted at end), I haven’t covered everything, incl adaptation, buildings, climate finance, green growth $$ (might do that one yet). /1
Big update for NDP. Platform said NDP “supported” carbon pricing but didn't specify price. This led many (incl me) to question impact and cost of the NDP plan. But budget matches Lib price schedule - $170/tonne in 2030. That will deliver signif and cost-effective reductions. /2
NDP promised to reduce or eliminate unfair industry C pricing “loopholes” but I'm not seeing a new revenue stream for that (open to correction!). So, budget suggests NDP plan will be more effective than previously implied, but obfuscation on price, fairness is disappointing. /3
Read 11 tweets
30 Aug
Some good stuff in here, some questions. /1
Trudeau promises to regulate oil and gas emissions, electric vehicle sales /via @globeandmail theglobeandmail.com/politics/artic…
more details here /2
liberal.ca/wp-content/upl…
The good: $ to support worker transition in oil/gas-dependent provinces; more ambitious methane red'ns by 2030; net zero electricity by 2035. More $ for EV purchases because, hey, it's election time. /3
Read 6 tweets
25 Feb
This is integral to the fed govt's v important carbon budget legislation (Bill C-12). Independent advice is critical to ensure govts set appropriate climate targets and stay on course. Can also provide a shared foundation of knowledge for parliamentarians. But.../1
There are different approaches. The UK Climate Change Committee is heavily weighted toward researchers, most from academia. theccc.org.uk/about/ /2
The Cdn one announced today is more diverse with representatives from Indigenous communities, govt, labour, ENGOs, business, academia. /3 canada.ca/en/services/en…
Read 7 tweets
25 Feb
In anticipation of a possible 2021 Canadian election, with a new fed climate plan on the table, and a new Paris Ag target to come by April, some thoughts on partisanship and #climate. Bear with me for 🧵, two proposals at end. #canpoli /1
It's tempting and easy to play partisan politics with climate for 5 reasons. 1. Most voters have no idea how far current policies are from what's needed. So parties still debate marginal policy shifts even as they *say* they are committed to 2/1.5C. /2
2. Climate action will have uneven costs on sectors, workers, provinces. They fight change. The oil ind has spent big $ on denial, obfuscation - with success. Parties still want those votes so are afraid to tell the truth. There WILL be new jobs but beneficiaries are unknown /3
Read 11 tweets
12 Nov 20
That Canada's Environment Minister would celebrate this initiative using Shell's "Carbon Neutral" framing is deeply troubling to me, for many reasons. /1
$0.02/litre is less than $9/tonne CO2. *IF* we still have credible (i.e., additional, lasting) offsets at that rate in Canada it speaks volumes to the failure of our government to adopt policies that move Canada, cost-effectively, toward our Paris Agreement target. /2
Worse, this reinforces the individual responsibility narrative -- "hey, just pay 2 cents more per litre and you can save the planet!" -- and in a way that undermines public support for much more costly *government* actions that are needed (still good investment!) /3
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(