Tonight begins my new course @ElliottSchoolGW: “Understanding U.S. Special Operations”
In it, we’ll learn what special ops/#SOF are & how these differ from conventional ops/forces; how US SOF came to be; how they’ve been used over time; & what major issues they face today. 1/n
If you want to follow along at home, I’ll be posting key topics & readings in this THREAD.
Week 1 is course overview & class intros, so while you wait for substance, you can buy our main text (Oppose Any Foe by @MarkMoyar) & watch this cool #SOF vid😎 2/n
Week 2/We baselined knowledge on definitions of #SOF & special ops, core activities of US SOF & @USSOCOM, & the organizational structure of the US SOF enterprise. BL: US SOF are far more than the popular portrayals of them in movies & video games. 3/n
@USSOCOM Week 2 Key Readings (use Google to find them):
• Joint Publication 3-05, Special Operations, Chapters 1 and 2
• US Code, Title 10 Sections 164, 165, and 167
• US Special Operations Command, “SOCOM Factbook 2021”
@USSOCOM Week 3/We explored 3 theories of special ops, w/the goal of answering 4 Qs: 1) How are special ops different from conventional ops? 2) Why would anyone conduct a special operation in the first place?
5/n
@USSOCOM 3) Once a decision is made to conduct a special operation, what can one do to maximize its chances of success? 4) How do those things differ for direct action versus unconventional warfare?
6/n
@USSOCOM The answers to these question can be found in our readings: 1. J. Schroden, Why Special Operations? A Risk-Based Theory, CNA COP-2020-U-028160-Final, Sep 2020: cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/…
7/n
@USSOCOM 2. W.H. McRaven, The Theory of Special Operations (Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School 1993): afsoc.af.mil/Portals/86/doc… 3. W. Driver & B. DeFeyter, The Theory of Unconventional Warfare: Win, Lose & Draw (Monterey, CA: Naval Postgraduate School 2008): soc.mil/SWCS/DOTDP/AY_… 8/n
Two required readings: 1. R.G. Spulack, Jr., “A Theory of Special Operations: The Origin, Qualities, and Use of SOF,” JSOU Report 07-7, October 2007, pp. 10-19 (jsou.libguides.com/ld.php?content…)
10/n
2. J. Faunce, “A History of Assessment and Selection,” Special Warfare (Jul-Dec 2016), pp. 12-18.
Recommended supplemental viewing:
- The SOF Operator:
()
- Rangers:
()
- SF Q-Course:
()
11/n
- Difference between Ranger School & SF Q-Course:
()
- SEALs:
()
- SWCCs:
()
()
- MARSOC:
()
- 160th SOAR:
()
12/n
Week 5/US #SOF Pre-History: We learned about the earliest incarnations of "special" USMIL units, including Darby's Rangers, Marine Raiders, 1st Special Service Force, & Frogmen + various other special Navy units.
Recommended reading/viewing:
- K. Finlayson, “Wars Should be Fought in Better Country than This: The First Special Service Force in the Italian Mountains,” Veritas 5:2 (2009), pp. 48-63.
15/n
- F. Whitlock, “U.S.-Canadian 1st Special Service Force in World War II,” World War II Magazine (Jan 2000).
- The Devil’s Brigade (film, 1968)
- R.W. Jones, Jr. “Beyond the Beach: The 2nd Rangers Fight Through Europe,” Veritas 5:1 (2009), pp. 16-32.
16/n
- Steve Balestrieri, “William Darby, Army SOF Legend and Old School Badass,” SOFREP, Feb 21, 2020.
- Darby’s Rangers (film, 1958)
- “Marine Corps Raiders,” Marine Corps University History Division
- Larry Slawson, “The Marine Raiders: A Brief History”
- Gung Ho! (film, 1943)
17/n
- “SEAL History: Origins of Naval Special Warfare—WWII,” Navy SEAL Museum.
- “Naval Special Warfare,” Naval History and Heritage Command ( history.navy.mil/browse-by-topi…)
- The Frogmen (film, 1951)
18/n
- @RobinsonL100, et al., “Improving the Understanding of Special Operations,” @RANDCorporation, 2018, Chap 2 (Creation of 6th Army Special Reconnaissance Unit).
Req'd reading: @MarkMoyar's "Oppose Any Foe" Chap. 3
Recommended:
- Michael Warner, “The Office of Strategic Services: America’s First Intelligence Agency,” CIA, May 2000. 20/n
@RobinsonL100@RANDCorporation@MarkMoyar - J.W. Chambers II, “Office of Strategic Services Training During World War II,” Studies in Intelligence 54:2 (Jun 2010), 1-28
- T. Sacquety, “The OSS: A Primer on the Special Operations Branches and Detachments of the Office of Strategic Services,” Veritas 3:4 (2007), 34-51 21/n
@RobinsonL100@RANDCorporation@MarkMoyar@CIA Recommended:
- @RobinsonL100, et al., “Improving the Understanding of Special Operations,” @RANDCorporation, 2018, Chap 4 (Creation of US Army SF), Chap 5 (SF Expansion Under Kennedy & Contraction Through the Vietnam War) & Chapt 6 (CIA-SOF Coop in SE Asia: 1961–1975). 25/n
HOT OFF THE PRESSES! My team @CNA_org just finished a pair of reports looking at the #psychology of #disinformation. We sought to answer two main Qs: 1) How does disinfo work on your brain? 2) What, if anything, can #DOD do about it? Summary findings in this THREAD. 1/n
@CNA_org The first report answers the first question: How does #disinformation work on your brain?
@CNA_org We identified four key psychological principles related to the absorption & spread of #disinformation: initial information processing; cognitive dissonance; the influence of groups, beliefs, & novelty; and the role of emotions & arousal. How do these work? 3/n
QUESTION: On #Afghanistan, is there been a decision yet on providing financial compensation of families of those civilians killed in the August 29th strike?
MR. KIRBY: I don't have an update for you on that today. 2/n
Q: Does the secretary owe Congress an update on over the horizon planning for #Afghanistan?
MR. KIRBY: I think what the secretary made clear in his sessions a week or so ago was that we would certainly communicate with Congress to the degree that they need more information...3/n
JUST OUT! My team @CNA_org just completed a quick-look project – led by Alex Powell – looking at lessons from historical examples of #maritime#sabotage for #StrategicCompetition. I’ll summarize some key findings & implications in this THREAD. 1/n
@CNA_org The impetus for this study was discussions w/various #SOF entities as well as the call for work in this area by the Joint Special Operations University in its 2021 “Special Operations Research Topics” guide: jsou.libguides.com/ld.php?content… 3/n
I’ve seen lots of discussion lately about #Taliban-captured weapons in #Afghanistan, much of which is ill-informed. So, I’m going to discuss five myths about this topic in this THREAD. 1/n
(Note: The format for this was inspired by this excellent “five myths about the #Taliban” article by @a_a_jackson that you should also read) 2/n
Myth 1: The #Taliban have captured $88 billion worth of weapons & equipment.
Not true. That number is (according to @SIGARHQ) the sum total of funding appropriated (not all of which was spent) for security reconstruction (mostly, the #ANDSF) since 2002. 3/n
Given recent events in #Afghanistan & my focus on that country since 2008, I’ve been engaging in a lot of professional reflection of late. I'm going to share some results of that in this (long) THREAD. 1/n
To do this, I went back and re-read everything I’ve written publicly on #Afghanistan over the past two years, as well as a few pertinent older pieces. I’ll post links to these articles as I go. 2/n
There was a man, who developed a rash on his hand. It wasn’t debilitating, but he desired to be rid of it. So he went to a doctor.
The doctor prescribed a cream & told the man to apply it every day. 2/n
This the man did. The rash receded, but did not disappear. The man kept applying the cream. Some time later, the rash began to expand again. Slowly, but discernibly, it was growing. 3/n