HOT OFF THE PRESSES! My team @CNA_org just finished a pair of reports looking at the #psychology of #disinformation. We sought to answer two main Qs: 1) How does disinfo work on your brain? 2) What, if anything, can #DOD do about it? Summary findings in this THREAD. 1/n
@CNA_org The first report answers the first question: How does #disinformation work on your brain?
@CNA_org We identified four key psychological principles related to the absorption & spread of #disinformation: initial information processing; cognitive dissonance; the influence of groups, beliefs, & novelty; and the role of emotions & arousal. How do these work? 3/n
@CNA_org Initial info processing: Our mental “processing capacity” is limited, so our brains take shortcuts to incorporate new info & those can open us up to mistakes. To the extent that we don’t process info as deeply as we should, #disinformation can be construed as true info. 4/n
@CNA_org Cognitive dissonance: People feel discomfort when confronted w/competing ideas. This motivates us to discount the importance of (or ignore) contradictory info or⬆️ the importance of compatible info. If #disinformation supports our beliefs, we’re more likely to believe it. 5/n
@CNA_org Groups, beliefs & novelty: We’re more likely to share info w/people we consider members of our group, when we think it's true, & when it’s novel or urgent. If #disinformation comes from "our group", is consistent w/our beliefs, or is new to us, we’re more likely to share it. 6/n
@CNA_org Emotion & arousal: We’re more likely to share info if we feel awe, amusement, or anxiety than if we feel sadness or contentment. Thus, #disinformation is more likely to be absorbed & shared if it is constructed to be emotional & arousing. 7/n
@CNA_org A key takeaway is that these principles aren't unique to #disinformation—they’re the same tools your brain uses to process all info. Thus, disinfo is absorbed & spread through *normal, routine & adaptive* mechanisms, which malign actors exploit & manipulate for their goals. 8/n
@CNA_org We ID'd 2 techniques in the literature to counter #disinformation associated w/more than one psych principle: 1) preventive inoculation (warning people about the effects of disinfo & how to spot it) & 2) encouraging deeper, analytic thinking about the info people encounter. 9/n
@CNA_org We also ID'd tricks to counter individual principles. For ex, to counter the effects associated w/groups, beliefs & novelty, researchers recommend creating unique content that encourages individuals to identify w/a broader “group” & increases their access to opposing info. 10/n
@CNA_org Researchers also recommend that #disinformation containment policies emphasize behavioral interventions aimed at countering the psych principles activated by disinfo, rather than solely focusing on the use of bots, algorithms & tech.
This is both a tech & a people problem. 11/n
@CNA_org So, what, if anything, can #DOD do about this?
We address that question in the second report, which you can find here: cna.org/CNA_files/PDF/… 12/n
@CNA_org We analyzed 5 cases of #disinformation in which absorption & spread benefited from the psych mechanisms described in the first report. These real-world examples clearly illustrate the human vulnerability to what we might call psychological hacking. 13/n
@CNA_org We examined: Op Secondary Infektion (#Russia campaign to foment division in Western countries); Endless Mayfly (#Iran effort to promote fake content); 2016 POTUS election; Hong Kong protests; & #CoronaJihad (attempt to blame #COVID outbreaks in #India on Muslims). 14/n
@CNA_org To illustrate, some details on Endless Mayfly. Named by researchers at Toronto U’s Citizen Lab, which studied these ops from Apr 2016 thru Nov 2018, it unfolded in 5 overlapping phases, each of which involved the creation, dissemination & amplification of false content. 15/n
@CNA_org The first step was the creation of fake personas, including students, activists & reporters. These were initially basic accounts w/little history, but over time they grew more robust as the “users” acquired bylines on third-party websites such as @BuzzFeed. 16/n
@CNA_org@BuzzFeed In steps 2-3, Endless Mayfly created 72 “lookalike” domains that mimicked well-known, highly credible news outlets, including @guardian, @TheAtlantic, @Independent & @haaretzcom, & populated them with malicious, scurrilous & false “copycat” content. 17/n
@CNA_org@BuzzFeed@guardian@TheAtlantic@Independent@haaretzcom@Twitter In terms of psych principles, Endless Mayfly played heavily on initial info processing—it hacked the authenticity of legitimate news sources by making lookalike content & effectively triggered our tendency to engage more superficially w/info that appears familiar. 21/n
@CNA_org@BuzzFeed@guardian@TheAtlantic@Independent@haaretzcom@Twitter@USSOCOM In this light, we offer a number of evidence-based interventions that #DOD should consider, in two categories. The first is “preventative inoculation,” which could include game-based inoculation, awareness campaigns, &/or video & banner reminders on DOD platforms. 27/n
@CNA_org@BuzzFeed@guardian@TheAtlantic@Independent@haaretzcom@Twitter@USSOCOM The second is “cultivation of deeper, analytic thinking,” which could include media literacy training, confirmation before posting requirements, pop-up windows alerting individuals to unregulated sites, pop-up windows sharing accurate info, & fact checking & verification. 28/n
QUESTION: On #Afghanistan, is there been a decision yet on providing financial compensation of families of those civilians killed in the August 29th strike?
MR. KIRBY: I don't have an update for you on that today. 2/n
Q: Does the secretary owe Congress an update on over the horizon planning for #Afghanistan?
MR. KIRBY: I think what the secretary made clear in his sessions a week or so ago was that we would certainly communicate with Congress to the degree that they need more information...3/n
JUST OUT! My team @CNA_org just completed a quick-look project – led by Alex Powell – looking at lessons from historical examples of #maritime#sabotage for #StrategicCompetition. I’ll summarize some key findings & implications in this THREAD. 1/n
@CNA_org The impetus for this study was discussions w/various #SOF entities as well as the call for work in this area by the Joint Special Operations University in its 2021 “Special Operations Research Topics” guide: jsou.libguides.com/ld.php?content… 3/n
Tonight begins my new course @ElliottSchoolGW: “Understanding U.S. Special Operations”
In it, we’ll learn what special ops/#SOF are & how these differ from conventional ops/forces; how US SOF came to be; how they’ve been used over time; & what major issues they face today. 1/n
If you want to follow along at home, I’ll be posting key topics & readings in this THREAD.
Week 1 is course overview & class intros, so while you wait for substance, you can buy our main text (Oppose Any Foe by @MarkMoyar) & watch this cool #SOF vid😎 2/n
Week 2/We baselined knowledge on definitions of #SOF & special ops, core activities of US SOF & @USSOCOM, & the organizational structure of the US SOF enterprise. BL: US SOF are far more than the popular portrayals of them in movies & video games. 3/n
I’ve seen lots of discussion lately about #Taliban-captured weapons in #Afghanistan, much of which is ill-informed. So, I’m going to discuss five myths about this topic in this THREAD. 1/n
(Note: The format for this was inspired by this excellent “five myths about the #Taliban” article by @a_a_jackson that you should also read) 2/n
Myth 1: The #Taliban have captured $88 billion worth of weapons & equipment.
Not true. That number is (according to @SIGARHQ) the sum total of funding appropriated (not all of which was spent) for security reconstruction (mostly, the #ANDSF) since 2002. 3/n
Given recent events in #Afghanistan & my focus on that country since 2008, I’ve been engaging in a lot of professional reflection of late. I'm going to share some results of that in this (long) THREAD. 1/n
To do this, I went back and re-read everything I’ve written publicly on #Afghanistan over the past two years, as well as a few pertinent older pieces. I’ll post links to these articles as I go. 2/n
There was a man, who developed a rash on his hand. It wasn’t debilitating, but he desired to be rid of it. So he went to a doctor.
The doctor prescribed a cream & told the man to apply it every day. 2/n
This the man did. The rash receded, but did not disappear. The man kept applying the cream. Some time later, the rash began to expand again. Slowly, but discernibly, it was growing. 3/n