1. The reports of a meeting between #Taliban and US govt officials in Doha, are troubling. First, I've not seen an official US statement confirming the meeting. I first saw it reported yesterday by @Reuters claiming an undisclosed US Govt source. bbc.com/news/world-asi…
2. I get a copy of every @StateDept and @DOD press statement. I checked for other sources. I can't confirm this meeting from any US Got source. That brings me to the second reason it's troubling. Allowing this reporting to bounce around the internet without either owning it or
3. denying it, causes the US Govt to potential advance disinformation in an already overtaxed information space. The Taliban have every reason to distract. Maybe we are meeting with them. If we are, it's obviously not being kept secret. If we aren't, why allow them to change the
1. I get why @TheDemocrats don't want to engage in a propaganda war, but by leaving the field to the #GQP, the disinformation will only get worse. Responding, to counter GQP falsehoods with truth is one tool that is being employed, but more subtle weapons can be employed that can
2. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think this was a historical first. Does it mean a CCP shift towards democracy? I doubt it. Likely just branding. But that's also significant.
And fun facts. He went to my kid's high school, & his daughter hated my dad. Had him declared PNG.😎
3. This was in my dad's negatives from 1947-9. I've always wondered if they were nationalists or communists. Now I think they were communists. No nationalist flag or iconography. Just Dr. Sun Yat-sen.
1. Okay @JusticeATR, there's no reason why enforcing the Antitrust laws can't also have the benefit of tamping down propaganda that carries the real risk of destroying our society and Republic. Free legal advice: Just use your enforcement power to force cable companies to sell
2. their product (electrons sent to your home) à la carte. No more bundles that force people to buy Fox News electrons. These companies all have either a monopoly or near monopoly in their market. They thus have sufficient "market power" to force a tie-in.
3. When they make purchase of @FoxNews electrons (tied product) as condition of being able to purchase other cable TV electrons (tying product) they violate Section 1 and likely Section 2 of the Sherman Act and can be subject to injunctive relief and damages. Just do it
1. Shortly after Janet Reno was confirmed as AG, she appointed my late brother to investigate the Reagan and Bush administration regarding allegations of justice department complicity in a number of alleged crimes. I was three years out of law school & kept up as best I could.
2. My brother was also the AG designee to review OPR findings and make binding recommendations on discipline. OPR is a like a state bar disciplinary counsel. As the name states, it deals with "professional responsibility" that is another way to say professional ethics. It can
3. issue disciplinary findings that can be used by state bar associations under reciprocity, that can result in suspension or disbarment. The IG is an investigative branch that can investigate fraud and refer it to the appropriate Criminal Division component for prosecution.
1. Like @neal_katyal, I'm docket watching the 5th Circuit and I just looked again and nothing has been filed. I think the reason may be simply, contrary to the panel on @MSNBC, that this is a disaster for the @TexasGOP. Sure, some will raise money of it but IMO application of
2. well-established political theory says that this is going to torch the GOP, not advance it. They did it because the Texas legislature was willing, but it does not reflect the vast majority of Texas' electorate. A corrupt election financing system created a Texas legislature
3. Frankenstein, but that monster does not reflect the electorate. So now, the GOP, nationally, has to decide if it wants to go all in. #KochNetwork is funding all of this. They do it to create chaos. Keep the base calling for blood.