QUESTIONS ANSWERED here about this🧵(thx for all the engagement!)
1) what do u mean by paper #bitcoin?
2) is all leverage bad?
3) why so sure that a leverage-flush reckoning day will come for bitcoin? Gold investors have waited forever.
4) can't traders hedge the risk? (haha, no)
2/ PAPER BITCOIN=a promise by an intermediary, such as an exchange, to deliver real #bitcoin. Unless you hold the private keys, you don't own bitcoin--what you own is a CLAIM to bitcoin (an IOU). Does your intermediary own enuf on-chain bitcoin to make good on all such claims???
3/ The honest truth is that probably no one other than your intermediary itself really knows & many intermediaries are likely running fractional. It is certain that the quantity of paper #bitcoin outstanding > the 18.9m on-chain bitcoins that exist, but by how much is unknowable.
4/ IS ALL LEVERAGE BAD? No. Leverage >1:1 is bad, but leverage < or = 1:1 is fine. When total leverage >1:1, it means there are more paper bitcoins than the 18.9m real, on-chain bitcoins that currently exist. It's impossible calculate the excess of paper bitcoins over the 18.9m.
5/ Why? bc there's almost zero public disclosure by #crypto intermediaries + some of the forms of leverage are v subtle (eg, collateral substitution, or ETF market-makers being allowed to go naked short to facilitate mkt liquidity, futures exchanges running unhedged books, etc).
6/ WHY SO SURE A DAY OF RECKONING IS COMING? This is a great ? & I'm glad several of you asked it. Many commodities mkts have the same situation (lots more paper versions than the real thing exists) & it's been that way for decades. But a reckoning will happen sooner in #bitcoin.
7/ How am I so confident? A simple reason: there will never be a clearinghouse of meaningful size for #bitcoin bc ~90% of it is in private hands, not intermediaries. That # fluctuates--can be as low as ~75% during bear mkts & goes up in bull mkts as ppl pull coins off exchanges.
8/ This is VERY different than other commodities where banks control the underlying bc they control the clearinghouse. Think abt gold--it's >95% owned by central banks & clearinghouses (eg LBMA). Retail can't force a short squeeze. But oh boy bitcoiners can force a short squeeze!
9/ We bitcoiners showed who really controls #bitcoin during the 2017 #UASF--it's retail bitcoiners, not intermediaries such as exchanges or miners. (Read the history if you don't understand that reference, bc it's critical for you to understand if you're in bitcoin at all.)
10/ As Warren Buffett likes to say, when the tide goes out you see who's swimming naked. Well, clearinghouses in #tradfi mkts (such as central banks & private utilities like ICE, CME etc) have the ability to reverse the tide at least temporarily to cover up who's swimming naked.
11/ How? So many ways--allowing failures to deliver, posting a different type of collateral, high collateral thresholds, allowing time to settle margin calls, permitting intraday overdrafts, #rehypothecation of posted collateral, etc etc etc--not to mention lender of last resort.
12/ But prob no one will be able to build a #bitcoin clearinghouse of meaningful size bc so much of #BTC is squirreled away beyond reach of big players or big central banks. There's no bitcoin lender of last resort or clearinghouse to temporarily bail out failing intermediaries.
13/ A few wks ago I tweeted #bitcoin could go no-offer someday (no one selling it to intermediaries desperately trying to buy it to survive). I meant no-offer TEMPORARILY, not permanently. A failing #bitcoin intermediary could fail w/in literally hours--that's all it might take.
14/ In other words, #bitcoin going no-offer for just a few hours could be all that's needed for that day of reckoning to occur. This is one reason why I've warned that traders can't look at bitcoin as if it's just another price-volatile asset to trade. it isn't. #apexpredator
15/ It's also a reason, among others, why I've warned that #WallSt banks can't treat #bitcoin as just another commodity, & have predicted that someday it could take down a G-SIB (a global systemically-important bank). Their systems just aren't set up to handle an asset like this.
16/ LAST QUESTION--CAN'T THIS RISK BE HEDGED? Haha, no. Short-term price fluctuations can be hedged, of course, but the big risk--the gap risk of #bitcoin going no-offer temporarily--can't. I've seen this before--models show that a risk can be delta-hedged, EXCEPT FOR tail risk.
17/ And then the tail scenario happens (a <1% scenario) & you're wiped out with a loss severity of >90%. There is no hedge for such a scenario in #bitcoin. Moreover, that scenario is far more likely in #bitcoin than 1%, for the reasons in #7 discussed above.

Good luck all! 🤠🔑

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠

Caitlin Long 🔑⚡️🟠 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CaitlinLong_

18 Dec
1/ I DIDN'T SEE SOMETHING UNTIL NOW. Often I've spoken about paper assets creating a fake supply that satisfies real demand, & that (all else equal) this causes an asset's price to fall. Most recently this came up in a debate with @timevalueofbtc abt using #MVRV to value #bitcoin
2/ The issue? RV isn't an accurate number bc it's impacted by all the paper #bitcoin issued by intermediaries. If all intermediaries always held 100% bitcoin reserves to back the bitcoin claims they issue, then RV would be reliable. But many intermediaries likely run fractional.
3/ I'm not saying RV isn't an observable # (of course it's observable). What I'm really saying is that RV isn't accurate--bc it's influenced by paper claims to #bitcoin being issued to satisfy demand for the real thing. You may have heard me talk about the 2017 Dole Food lawsuit.
Read 17 tweets
29 Oct
1/ JUST PUBLISHED article abt #stablecoin interoperability in @CentralBanking_ (yep...!)--another collaboration w/ Dr.Manmohan Singh of @IMFNews + my 1st w/ Dr Charles Kahn of Univ of IL. 🚨VERY IMPORTANT NEW POINT included🔥 (behind a firewall but 🧵👇).
centralbanking.com/fintech/789225…
2/ Best historical analogy for #stablecoins isn't wildcat banking--it's check clearing. Private pre-Fed check clearing networks are analogous to different private stablecoin networks today. What made checks interoperable?

💡2 things: common standard+Fed guarantee of pymt at par
3/ We argue #stablecoin issuers should gain access to Fed payment systems so they can back stablecoins w/ central bank reserves (ie, guarantee of pymt at par to members of Fed's network), but ALSO that the choice of tech should be agnostic. (The mkt has already voted on this.)
Read 10 tweets
9 Oct
@kwerb 1/ Well said @kwerb. When I started writing in 2016 abt the dangers of leverage-based financialization in #bitcoin mkts for @ForbesCrypto, I was worried abt #WallSt banks bringing it. What I missed was that #crypto peeps wld beat the big banks to it—& wld do it MUCH bigger. How?
@kwerb @ForbesCrypto 2/ bc they did it offshore. They beat #WallSt to it bc (1) regulators held back big banks/regulated derivatives exchanges & (2) onshore firms are capped on leverage they can offer. Example: onshore US #BTC futures can be leveraged ~2.5x but offshore can be 20x (was 125x until…
@kwerb @ForbesCrypto 3/ …some offshore exchanges voluntarily reduced it to 20x after much criticism of the practice—deserved, IMHO—but 20x is still much higher than regulators would allow onshore). The recent bull market brought in many speculators (incl many w/ WallSt trading backgrounds). I’d…
Read 8 tweets
5 Oct
1/ "Even in the face of regulatory threats, #crypto enthusiasts see each development as a step towards mainstream acceptance. So it's no surprise that a new crypto-friendly bank becoming a member of the Federal Reserve would be a headline grab."🤠@AvantiBT
businessinsider.com/ceo-crypto-ban…
2/US banking law is confusing but @lailamaidan got it right--@AvantiBT is different--is eligible for BOTH access to Fed's payment system & to become Fed member PLUS has applied for BOTH. (OCC trust banks aren't depository institutions so aren't eligible for payment system access)
3/ I can't think of another industry that is so deposit-constrained: ~$80bn of USD bank deposits supports >$2trn in assets. Our industry has a big single point of failure risk: USD banking access. Plus there's lots of settlement risk in trad banks when they bank #crypto industry.
Read 10 tweets
2 Oct
1/JUST FINISHED the first of my series of speeches this month to mainstream audiences about #bitcoin/#crypto--this one was to @actl, annual meeting of American College of Trial Lawyers. Multiple Supreme Court justices usually in audience. Two key themes:
2/ First, I recommended swift clarification of legal status of #digitalassets so US courts aren't clogged w/ disputes in this $2trn industry due to murky laws (incl swift passage of draft UCC Article 12, or even early adopting it). It's on agenda for @uniformlaws mtg on Nov5-6.
3/ #Wyoming led charge to make #blockchain tech "backwards compatible w/ US legal system"--draft UCC Art. 12 (similar to WY law) was already early-adopted by AR, NE & TX. We're seeing increasing litigation due to murky laws--not only clogs courts but consumer fairness issues too.
Read 8 tweets
1 Oct
1/ THIS IS WHERE WE ALWAYS THOUGHT the #stablecoin regulatory direction would go, which is why @AvantiBT chose to get a bank charter. Anything that touches the USD financial system was always going to fall w/in the Fed's purview, directly or indirectly, esp once it became big.
2/ Plus it makes sense policy-wise. Nonbank #stablecoin issuers gum up the #repo mkt by siloing T-bills & other Level 1 high-quality liquid assets (the repo mkt already finds these assets too scarce). If stablecoin issuers are banks, tho, dormant Fed reserves can be used instead.
3/ Details on the above point are here👇. The v high velocity of #stablecoins comes from their superior tech vs trad payment systems, not from leverage. Traditionally, monetary velocity came from leverage. But thanks to stablecoins it no longer needs to.💪
cato.org/cato-journal/s…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(