NEW @CookPolitical: Republicans are still clear favorites in 2022, but there are poised to be perhaps 3-8 *more* Biden-won seats after redistricting than there are now - creating a House map less biased towards the GOP than the past decade's. cookpolitical.com/analysis/house…
So far, district lines are complete (or awaiting sign-off) in 293 districts, more than two thirds of the House. There are 15 seats that have shifted from GOP-leaning to Dem-leaning @CookPolitical PVIs, and just 9 that have moved the other way.
This is a positive long-term trade for Dems. However, because Dems *already hold* 11/15 newly Dem-leaning seats, that means only four are pickup opportunities. By contrast, Rs only hold 1/9 newly GOP-leaning seats, giving them twice as many newly ripe targets in 2022.
The far more dramatic effect of redistricting so far: a continued obliteration of swing seats. The number of single-digit Biden/Trump seats has plummeted from 62 to 46 (-26%), and the number of seats decided by less than 5 pts is down from 39 to 23 (-41%).
We're pleased to offer this analysis in front of our paywall. To kick off 2022, @CookPolitical is also offering a free two-week trial subscription, w/ easy cancellation (promo code: STATEOFPLAY122). cookpolitical.com/subscribe
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread: yes, the new House map is on track to be slightly more *equitable* (less pro-GOP) than the current one. But keep in mind, it's also on track to feature:
- Even fewer competitive seats
- Even wider disparities in maps' treatment of non-white voters from state to state
I think @mcpli's broader point is fair, but the way I'd frame it is that vastly different standards are being applied to non-white communities in TX vs. IL, AL vs. VA, etc. depending on partisan motive, absent a clearer set of VRA rules from SCOTUS/Congress.
If federal courts unpacked #VA03 to create an additional Black opportunity district in 2016, a consistent interpretation of the VRA would also demand that #AL07, #LA02 and likely #SC06 be unpacked to create second Black majority seats too.
Thread: which party is "ahead" in redistricting? In my view, it's close to a wash. But the truth is, it depends which metric you use.
As @Nate_Cohn has alluded, tracking by district partisanship (slight Dem gain) differs from tracking by seat control (neutral/slight GOP gain).
New Jersey's new map is a perfect illustration. By @CookPolitical PVI (a measure of districts' 16/20 prez performance vs. national result), three seats have gone from R-leaning to D-leaning: #NJ03, #NJ05 and #NJ11.
Meanwhile, one seat moves from D-leaning to R-leaning: #NJ07.
By district partisanship metrics, that sounds like a great deal for Dems. And it mostly is!
However, Dems currently hold *all four* of these seats. That means the new map's most likely practical outcome in 2022 is still a Dem loss of one seat (9D-3R, down from 10D-2R in 2020).
BREAKING: here’s the new NJ congressional map that throws #NJ07 Rep. Tom Malinowski (D) under the bus and shores up Reps. Andy Kim (D) #NJ03, Josh Gottheimer (D) #NJ05 and Millie Sherrill (D) #NJ11 for a likely 9D-3R split.
*Mikie, not Millie (damn autocorrect)
Meaningful partisan shifts in this new map:
#NJ03 Kim (D) - Trump +0.2 to Biden +14 #NJ05 Gottheimer (D) - Biden +5 to Biden +12 #NJ07 Malinowski (D) - Biden +10 to Biden +4 #NJ11 Sherrill (D) - Biden +7 to Biden +17
NEW: California's near-final draft map looks terrific for Dems. All 42 Dem incumbents (except retiring Rep. Alan Lowenthal (D), whose Long Beach seat is folded in w/ LA Rep. Lucille Roybal-Allard (D)'s), get strong seats.
Meanwhile, *five* of 11 GOP seats get more vulnerable.
Biggest winners on this draft map:
#CA07 Bera (D) - Biden +14 to +18 #CA10 Harder (D) - Biden +3 to +11 #CA39 Kim (R) - Biden +10 to +2 #CA45 Porter (D) - Biden +11 (unchanged) #CA50 Issa (R) - Trump +8 to +12
Biggest losers on this draft map:
#CA04 McClintock (R) - Trump +10 to +2 #CA21 Valadao (R) - Biden +11 to +13 #CA25 Garcia (R) - Biden +10 to +12 #CA42 Calvert (R) - Trump +7 to +1 #CA48 Steel (R) - Biden +2 to +6
New: Virginia special masters' map eliminates Abigail Spanberger's (D) current suburban Richmond #VA07 & turns it into a safe Dem seat in Northern Virginia. Rep. Elaine Luria's #VA02 would remain highly competitive, for a 6D-4R-1C split overall.
By the numbers, this might be a slightly better map for Dems than the current one (5D-4R-2C), but much better for Republicans than had Democrats retained redistricting power and drawn an 8D-3R gerrymander.
This map would force Spanberger to move from the Richmond suburbs to Northern Virginia to keep a seat (the northern end of the current #VA07 is folded into Wexton's #VA10).
And, Rep. Elaine Luria's (D) #VA02 gets redder by losing Norfolk. It moves from Biden +5 to +2.
NEW: the first official draft map from California's commission is here, and it's both a major shakeup and a mixed bag for the parties. Early read: it could perform quite well for Rs in 2022, but offer longer-term upside for Dems. Read on... wedrawthelinesca.org/draft_maps
First, the five biggest "losers" in this draft (which will change before 12/27):
#CA10 Harder (D) - Biden +3 to Trump +10 #CA22 Nunes (R) - Trump +5 to Biden +9 #CA40 Roybal-Allard (D) - seat eliminated #CA48 Steel (R) - Biden +2 to +9 #CA50 Issa (R) - Trump +8 to Biden +1
Next, other "losers" who would be at heightened risk:
#CA04 McClintock (R) - Trump +10 to +5 #CA25 Garcia (R) - Biden +10 to +13 #CA42 Calvert (R) - Trump +7 to Tied #CA45 Porter (D) - Biden +11 to +4 #CA49 Levin (D) - Biden +13 to +9 #CA53 Jacobs (D) - Biden +36 to +8