2/ Firstly, to understand how this has happened requires an understanding of #Corbyn himself, who has been woefully mischaracterised in soft left accounts of his period as leader, perhaps most notably (for the left) @OwenJones84's "This Land"...
3/ #Corbyn is not "indecisive". Thankfully he's not a weathervane either. When making a decision he considers a range of views before determining the correct course of action. When comes to a view he sticks to it firmly and usually he is right.
4/ His record of calling it right comes not from some innate clairvoyance but his tendency to do research and seek to understand a problem or situation before coming to a firm view (he does read books, BTW: not sure where the rumour that he doesn't came from)
5/ That's why he is never going to apologise for comments that he knows to be fundamentally correct. As leader of #Labour, he wasn't always the master of his own destiny in the sense of having to maintain a balance of interests just to stay in office & have a shot at real change
6/ But now that weight is off his shoulders he is free to do as he judges right. The #starmer leadership strategy appears to have been a reprise of the "break him as a man" gambit from 2016 by being so awful to provoke a sense of panic.
7/ And thus to bounce him into making a mistake such as prematurely declaring an intention to form a new party. He is plainly not going to do that. In insisting that Corbyn "apologise so everyone can move on" #Starmer had bet on Corbyn doing the same as other left wingers...
8/ Back down and/or apologise therefore cementing #Starmer's authority. According to this strategy, the ball is in Corbyn's court and any decision he makes will be his "mistake". Split the left or capitulate to get the whip back. But it's a dumb move...
9/ Because Corbyn knows his mind, won't panic and isn't about to make a rash decision. His sure enough in himself and his record to know that his future doesn't depend on the whims of a political minnow like #starmer. As recent visits to Europe and Mexico show...
10/ #Corbyn is an international statesman. He doesn't need Labour as much as it needs him, not least because if he stands again in Islington and Labour choose to put someone up against him, he will win. He is a much loved local MP...
11/ so in truth the ball has bounced off the net and back into #Starmer's court. #Starmer can restore the Whip and save an electoral headache but undermine his own authority. Or, he can force Corbyn to stand against #Labour, lose the party the seat and undermine his own authority
12/ The most sensible thing #Starmer could do (from his own point of view) would be to #RestoreTheWhip. But he won't do that because he appears to lack common sense or basic competence. Worse still (for Starmer) withdrawing the whip from JC hasn't just hurt the Party in Islington
13/ #Corbyn is genuinely popular amongst a large cohort of voters that #Labour needs to win. Withdrawing the whip showed that #Labour isn't serious about the real change, so many voters - particularly young people - desperately need. The Party can only get so far off the back...
14/ Of Tory cock ups. It needs its own constituency to win, which is why the polling lead is soft and diminishing already. Right now, #Labour has few people who actually WANT to vote FOR them. There is no real base of support to rely upon.
15/ #Starmer's mundane mix of anticorbynism and tinkering with Toryism may seem tame but in reality he's taking a HUGE risk and will likely lose. Not in the least because #Labour needs canvassers. #Labour needs Corbyn more than he needs Labour...
16/16 This gives Corbyn the upper hand. Any outcome is likely to turn out to be a victory for him, and the ball's in #Starmer's court. Starmer just needs to decide how badly he'll lose. The one cause he's pursued with any passion is destroying Corbynism, and he's going to fail.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Final long thread for this week. Many people believe the attempt to extradite #Assange to be morally repugnant & based upon legally dubious arguments. Less well understood are the details of the “enabling act” that facilitated it & reduced all of our rights. #FreeAssange
2/ The offending legislation is the 2003 Extradition Act. This was designed to pave the way for new extradition treaties, including, most controversially, the “unequal” extradition treaty with the United States: dumptheguardian.com/politics/2006/….
3/ Somewhat ironically, although it was much criticised at the time, the 2006 Extradition Treaty, under which Assange is being threatened with extradition but the “enabling act” of 2003.
1/ Another thread on the awful #NationalityandBordersBill: a lot of commentators are saying that the Bill "creates second-class citizens of millions of Britain’s dual nationals" or allows "the Home Secretary" to strip citizenship without warning". As usual the reality's worse...
2/ As is true of left commentators' rhetoric on the "Tory #HealthAndCareBill", the idea that the #NationalityandBordersBill makes "second class citizens of dual nationals", overlooks the problems brought in by #Labour legislation: the 2006 Immigration Asylum and Citizenship Act.
3/ The truth is that the Home Secretary has had the power to withdraw citizenship since 2006. The new legislation "just" ensures that citizenship can be withdrawn without telling them first. This will obviously make it harder for people to challenge. #NationalityandBordersBill
1/ The tide turning against #johnson over #DowningStParty is odd. Yes, it was terrible behaviour but we've come to expect it & his gov. has done much worse without the same scrutiny. So, why now and why over this? #DowningStreetChristmasParty
2/ #Johnson the populist was a useful means of defeating #JeremyCorbyn in 2019. A more obviously "respectable" establishment figure would have struggled* (*see Theresa May). But as Ken Clarke explained in 2019, Johnson is not the establishment's ideal PM telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/…
3/ This isn't because he is unusually venal & corrupt* (*see, for example, most British Govs.) but he doesn't participate in the parliamentary theatre in the correct way: a way that would disguise the fundamental corruption of Britain's ruling class...
1/ Thread: disagree with this. Seems details of the No.10 party have been known by many for a long time. If MSM wanted to pursue it when it was more timely, they could have... voxpoliticalonline.com/2021/12/08/is-… via @MidWalesMike
2/ Plus, the "Johnson is a corrupt liar" narrative is useful as it plays on the "1 bad apple" trope, as does the idea that "the Johnson Government is uniquely bad" and that once normality is restored our problems will go away... #Number10Party
3/ By contrast the horrific Nationality and Borders Bill and #NHSprivatisation legislation making its way through Parliament, exposes the truth about the less-than benevolent intentions of the British state. The #HealthAndCareBill is built upon years of cross-party legislation...
@UrbaneSlave@AhoFrank@Rachael_Swindon 1/ #Starmer's positive personal approval ratings were the cause of a huge amount of complacency when he first became leader. What was overlooked was that, even at the start, they were in decline. There was a collision between expectations and reality...
@UrbaneSlave@AhoFrank@Rachael_Swindon 2/The more he supported the Tories, the lower is ratings got until they tanked completely. I was clear in 2020 that Labour was not benefitting from Tory errors over #Covid_19 due to #Starmer's position of support for the Government. This was ignored to #Labour's detriment.
@UrbaneSlave@AhoFrank@Rachael_Swindon 3/ Bear in mind that the "20 points ahead" argument that advocated #Starmer as leader was based on a real trend of oppositions - particularly Labour - results are worse in real elections than mid term polling. Historically, Government's that are slightly behind go on to win.
1/ Friday morning polling analysis: A lot of people are getting excited about this poll because they think it means Labour may have a chance of winning under #Starmer. Actually, it's a bad poll for the Tories and #Labour. Here's why...
2/ 35% is on the high end of #Labour's polling range under #Starmer this past year but it does not represent a significant uptick in support from what we've come to expect. The really interesting figure is that the Tories are on 33%...
3/ over the past year, Tory polling has been bottoming out around the high 30s and previously reached as far as the high 40s. But the decline in support is real and more recently, they have been polling at the lower end of this range...