How to determine what a genuine scientific debate looks like. Citation credits: Dr Nini Munoz.
TLDR:
1. Not all things in science are debatable. Pundits would have you think otherwise.
2. General debate tactics don't necessarily fly in scientific debate.
TLDR:
1. Not all things in science are debatable. Pundits would have you think otherwise.
2. General debate tactics don't necessarily fly in scientific debate.
Witness an example of a really well done scientific debate on Quantum physics (citation credits @WorldSciFest :
Note:
1. None of the panel sealioned.
2. None of the panel gish galloped.
3. None of the panel used conspiracy.
4. None of the panel made mistakes in basic physics.
5. None of the panel tried to debate bedrock physics facts.
6. None of the panel presented false dichotomies.
1. None of the panel sealioned.
2. None of the panel gish galloped.
3. None of the panel used conspiracy.
4. None of the panel made mistakes in basic physics.
5. None of the panel tried to debate bedrock physics facts.
6. None of the panel presented false dichotomies.
7. None of the panel appealed to emotion.
8. None of the panel used ad hominems.
9. None of the panel goalpost shifted.
8. None of the panel used ad hominems.
9. None of the panel goalpost shifted.
Now I invite everyone to use what Dr Nini Munoz wrote to help you better approach the current fast moving topics in vaccine science.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
