RIA quotes Putin's advisor, Vladimir Medinsky, who is also slated to head the Russian delegation, as saying that #Ukraine has agreed to talks ria.ru/20220227/ukrai…
The negotiations will take place at the border between Belarus and #Ukraine according to a Russian outlet.
At the same time, President Putin has placed his strategic (nuclear) deterrence force on high alert
Putin, who is meeting with Defense Minister Shoigu, and Gerasimov, says the decision to place #Russia's nuclear force on high alert is due to the "unfriendly" steps taken by Western countries
In general, what we've seen is that a public de-escalatory move from #Russia is generally accompanied by an escalation on the ground.
I would not be surprised if we see the most significant attempt to take Kyiv in the coming day
This plays into what I have mentioned here ⬇️
And after the gamble Putin took in Ukraine and his revisionist ramblings/James-Bond villain speech before the invasion, Western leaders must truly wonder if he has gone mad, or is just "playing" mad
Russian media had claimed that Mykola Tochitsky, Ukraine's Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, will head the delegation
Don't be fooled, Putin is still doing what he does best: Forcing negotiations to be held while pointing a gun at Kyiv and its allies.
The timing of the alert and ceasefire talks is not coincidental. The news were released almost exactly at the same time by Russian news outlets.
Now that one of Putin's "guns" (the Russian army) appears to be slightly less effective than initially thought, he is waving the good old nuclear threat.
#Ukraine's Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba says Putin's decision to place #Russia's nuclear forces on high alert is meant to put pressure on the Ukrainian delegation. unian.ua/politics/kuleb…
I hope this is not the case but I do think Kuleba's assessment (& mine above), may actually be the optimistic scenario. It's based on the idea that the negotiations occurring now have any kind of significance, which would push Putin to try and gain leverage ahead of the talks ⬇️
I think the pessimistic scenario (realistic one, on second thought?) is that these negotiations do not matter. Raising the nuclear threat is not a ploy to gain leverage, it is a pre-emptive move to intimidate the West as #Russia prepares to escalate its offensive vs #Ukraine
Zelensky says he does not believe much in the outcome of the meeting with Russian forces near Belarus. "Let them try", "it may only be a small one, but there is a chance" #Ukraine#Russia
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here is what this may mean (some fairly obvious some less): 1. Belarus will join the war 2. Russia is not negotiating in good faith 3. Talks are liable to collapse. 4. Offensive may be aimed at cutting off supply from western #Ukraine before Kyiv receives additional support
This is also a very worrying sign (besides being a war crime).
More than four days into #Russia's offensive against #Ukraine as talks are slated to start, here is my broad of view of the situation, and where things may go from here ⬇️
Overall, I think it is clear that the Ukrainian military is holding far better than #Russia expected. I don't exclude that Putin was presented a flawed/optimistic view of how things should have gone. As of now the record that was being played in his hear is scratching ⬇️
This is not to say that #Russia has not made any significant advances. Russian forces in the south are on the verge of potentially linking the Donbass with Crimea through a "pincer" move. Linking the two definitely was one of Russia's strategic goals, albeit not the main ⬇️
Statement from the commander of #Kyiv's defense this morning:
- Over past day, #Russia continued to attempt to break through city's defense.
- Tried to storm city outskirts.
- All attempts by Russian troops to achieve their goal failed.
- Enemy suffered significant losses
⬇️
- Russian columns were destroyed.
- Russian forces are demoralized and exhausted.
- We have shown we will protect our home from "uninvited guests".
- Situation under control.
I am wondering if the Mayor of Kyiv is speaking literally when saying that the city is "surrounded". We've been mapping out the Russian offensive, and it seems to me that areas southwest of Kyiv only saw sporadic clashes during Vasylkiv assault yesterday
I am not trying to minimize how dangerous the situation is, but saying that it is impossible to leave Kyiv and that "all ways are blocked" is a big deal for people there.
If any one want to pitch in regarding this, feel free.
Well this is getting weird. Now the Mayor of Kyiv says news that Kyiv is surrounded and that evacuation is impossible is false. He claims it was circulated by Russian outlets - but it came from an interview of him in AP!
#Breaking The Kremlin says a Russian delegation has arrived in the Belarusian city of Homel for talks with Ukrainian officials, according to the Kremlin Press Secretary (quoted by TASS)
No indication as to what the Ukrainian response may be but this ⬇️ is a reminder that Belarus is not a neutral country.
And from what I am seeing, Russian forces are pressing the attack near Kyiv
#Breaking: In his speech Zelensky acknowledged Russian proposal, and made the point I mentioned above: #Ukraine cannot negotiate in #Belarus, as it is no longer a neutral country.