💉 Without mandates, people’s opposition to #vaccines was softer than one might guess — only 3.3% of those surveyed. With mandates, resistance quintupled, to 16.5%.
“To increase and sustain vaccination rates, change people’s beliefs, and build trust. People have to feel that the guidance they’re getting from the government makes sense and is reliable. And it’s key to get the word out that the vaccines really work.”
– Katrin Schmelz
“Looking beyond COVID, we might have to take on board that some of the standard tools of public policy — mandates — backfire if experienced as a limit on freedom rather than a necessity for expanding the freedom of all to lead a more normal life in pandemic times.”
– Sam Bowles
“Mandates do not cancel the need to change hearts & minds. If mandates are implemented, then enforcement by governments & persuasion by trusted medical professionals should be deployed not as alternatives but as complements, each contributing synergistically.”
– Katrin Schmelz
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's good to be back! Follow this thread for the video stream & live coverage of tonight's first SFI Community Lecture at @TheLensic in two years, featuring @Sara_Imari on the #physics of living #systems.
And stay tuned for an extraordinary lineup of additional talks this year...
“We looked at the price of #coal over 140 years. Mines are much more sophisticated, the technology for locating new deposits is much better. Prices have not come down.”
- SFI's Doyne Farmer (@INETOxford)
For more on the #CleanEnergy transition, check out this press release, 44-page report, and video presentation on the science and economics supporting the argument for NM to make the leap — authored by SFI Profs Blumsack, Hines, Moore, and Trancik:
"Part of what we're going to exploit is the multiple definitions behind something [as fundamental as] 'environment' ... in SOME ways, you don't care much about the thing you're looking at; you care about its EFFECT."
"The environment is an actor and a character in all of our stories. But too often we treat it as something to be regressed away. I joke: 'Find me a piece of DNA that behaves without interaction with its environment.'"
- @big_data_kane (@Yale) speaking now:
"If we just want to make forecasts, learning the mechanisms may not matter."
- @svscarpino (SFI, @RockefellerFdn)
"All the way back to Farr, he's telling us that the curves aren't symmetric. We keep using models that we KNOW are wrong."
- @svscarpino (SFI, @RockefellerFdn)
"The idea that humanity actually *could* go extinct required a lot of ideas to come together. First you needed to know that species go extinct. This wasn't clear until [the discovery of fossil Mastodons]."
- @anderssandberg of @FHIOxford at SFI today:
"It's not just that the end of the world could be caused by a bad political decision. In principle, the *right* political decision or technology could *avert* these risks. In the 19th C, it was a considered merely a matter of natural causes."
- @anderssandberg (@FHIOxford) at SFI
"It remains to be seen if we'll rise to this challenge. I'm optimistic, but there's so much more we need to do. We're good at developing new technologies...are we as good at the society-scale change we need?"
- SFI/@MIT Prof Jessika Trancik on @voxdotcom:
@MIT@voxdotcom "If you're purchasing a #CleanEnergy technology, you're creating a market that then drives more #innovation, so everybody can contribute. It DOES also mean that we can't find #SilverBullets. We can't find one really smart person to solve this. We need everyone to contribute."
@MIT@voxdotcom "The way we can get larger projects to improve more quickly is #standardization. We need to understand the parts that are holding projects back, where the inefficiencies come in. I use a broad definition of #technology because these #inefficiencies crop up in different ways."