A LOT of countries have been making noises about introducing new or reformed carbon taxes 💷 of late. Including...THREAD. 1/6.
AUSTRIA
Starting July 1, Austrians will pay a new #carbontax of 30 euros (approximately $33) per ton of CO2 — a cost that’s likely to be added to consumer bills by companies. That amounts to 55 euros ($60) per ton in 2025. 2/6. forbes.com/sites/brianpec…
THE USA
According to the @WSJ, the American Petroleum Institute has drafted a proposal urging #Congress to adopt a carbon tax. The proposal suggests rebating some of the revenue collected to households & investing the rest of the money in new tech. 3/6. wsj.com/articles/oil-t…
DENMARK
Last Month, Denmark's government proposed introducing a uniform carbon tax of 1,125 Danish crowns ($164.21) per tonne of #carbon dioxide equivalent for heavy industries and the #energy sector as a way to reach its ambitious #climate targets. 4/6. reuters.com/world/europe/d…
CHINA
China’s ETS became fully operational in 2021 & is already 3 x bigger than the EU's. Now China’s ETS is about to grow 70% under plans to add heavy industry & manufacturing, making it the largest global #climatepolicy. 5/6. forbes.com/sites/energyin…
And finally, while other countries contemplate strengthening their approach carbon taxation, Scott Morrison's govt in Australia continues to try and weaponise the policy to dilute #climateaction... 🙄. 6/6.
1. Energy efficiency
With changes to supply taking years to deliver, measures to reduce demand could have been a short-term way to support families with the higher cost of energy. Energy efficiency measures would have made an esp large difference to low-income households...2/10.
...given that 49% of the poorest 1/5 people live in homes with uninsulated walls. One obvious policy option would have been to bolster the Energy Company Obligation scheme with taxpayer funds. This would have provided highly targeted support...3/10.
It took a couple of weeks but we've (finally) finished reading @beisgovuk's long-awaited and extremely comprehensive consultation on developing the UK ETS.
Here are some headlines & reactions for those who don't quite have the band-width for the full 157 pages:
Disappointingly, the Govt is proposing a much more piecemeal increase in the scope of the #UKETS than first mooted - with expansion limited to the domestic shipping and waste sectors only...2/5.
...bringing these sectors into the #carbonpricing system is, of course, welcome, but it represents a row-back on what was originally promised and is missed opportunity to address carbon pricing gaps in key high-emitting sectors like heat and buildings and road transport. 3/5.
We finally finished geeking out 🤓 on @hmtreasury's interim Net Zero Review report and thought it was worth a proper explainer 🗣️. With thanks to @ChiefExecCCC for summing things up better than we ever could 👌
Clumsy framing here 🤨, especially since our #netzero target is supposed to be legally binding... Instead of bemoaning #ClimateAction , @BBCEnvironment should be asking why so many campaigners feel compelled to mount #legal challenges against the #government. 1/4. THREAD.
The action by @GoodLawProject, @TransportActio2 & @PlanB_earth isn't about 'hounding' the government' - it's about holding them to account when they make decisions that conflict with their own #climate commitments...2/4
The government's brazenness in taking such actions should be a concern for everyone, and needs to be addressed if the UK genuinely wants to be considered a ‘world beating' force for protecting the #environment...3/4.