1) #SNARK vs #STARK
>In general, SNARKs require a trusted setup, while STARKs is trustless( via verifiable randomness),
>SNARKs uses elliptic curves, vuln to quantum attacks, while STARKs is quantum-resistant
>STARK has a larger proof size (less desirable.)
However...
(5/13)
Tech advancement have blurred the lines, where @0xPolygonZero's Plonky2, a recursive SNARK 100x faster than existing alternatives, combines PLONK(SNARK) with FRI (STARK), with fast proofs and no trusted setup. (6/13)
1) zkRollup:
Data is published on-chain (on same settlement & DA layer)
2) Validium:
Data offchain reduces cost,(with higher privacy) but less decentralized
(7/13)
3) Volition:
A hybrid data availability model (Rollups + Validium). User choose when to place data onchain or offchain.
A good example is @zksync, where zkRollup root is the Rollup portion and #zkPorter is the Validium mode.
(DA under Validium is secured by Validators.)
(8/13)
4)Adamantium ethresear.ch/t/adamantium-p…
"Upgraded" Validium, which retains the scaling benefits of offchain availability, without trusting the Data Availability Commitee(DAC). Even when users are offline, funds can't be stolen/frozen and can be moved back to L1 automatically. (9/13)
Notable mention:
While @zkSync’s zkPorter is rather similar to Starkware’s Validium, zkSync community seems more decentralized as it is made up of “Guardian” incentivized by ZkSync’s Token, rather than an appointed group of DAC by Starkware. (10/13)
3) Different types of zkEVM/VM
Diff. projs have different approaches to solving zkEVM. @LuozhuZhang wrote a good thread here:
In short, it can be categorized into
1)Language Lvl (Starkware/Matterlabs)
2)Bytecode Lvl (Scroll/Hermes)
3)Consensys Lvl
(11/13)
For "language lvl", Solidity is being transpiled into zk friendly languages(e.g. Cairo & Zinc) to be run on their own VMs,
While "Bytecode lvl", can achieve full compatibility at EVM opcode level, thus L1 apps and tools can be migrated to L2 without additional mods.
(12/13)
Latest raise/valuations to my knowledge:
Starkware: raised 100m at $8B
Matterlabs: raised 50M at $2B
Polygon: currently $5.6B FDV (@ $0.56)
Mina: if based on 1.5B token, $915M FDV
Aztec: Raised 17.2M at ?? Val
Scroll: Raised 30M at ?? Val
Aleo: Raised 200M as $1.45B
(13/13)
1/x🧵 Thread on #NFT#Alpha, & recent opps. to look at. (probable Alpha at the end of the thread)
3 ways to play NFT (and how it related to DeFi plays) 1) Get into #whitelist ( pre-seed/private round) 2) #Minting ( Public sale ) 3) #Secondary markets ( listed & freely traded)
2/x Whitelist (AKA private rd)
A few ways 1) Own Bluechips #NFT (might give u either a full whitelist chance, or higher prob% getting into whitelist.) e.g recent @SecretGarden_FM WL from @capsule_house 2) Community Grind (time spent not 100% rewarded) 3) Sybil (Pls don't do that)
3/x Minting (Publicsale):
(will skip the part on DD of the project, as this is more about the process)
1) Hot projects, where there is already alot of traction, be prepared to pay a bit more due to GAS WARS. 2) Reveal dates are the best to hunt for rares for a lower price.
There is no right way of valuing NFTs, but hopefully this can act as a guide for people who are looking to enter the NFT space, for both for Fun & Profit, as NFT are generally less straightforward as #DeFi, where #cashflow & #TVL can be a good proxy.
2/x
Rule of thumb:
Similar to how you value a #DeFi token based on Future #cashflow, one can gauge the Value of the #NFT via the utility & future potential #airdrop/cashflow it can bring.
3/x It's a better gauge than simply "Oh the Art is good."
Ofc, the Art itself, can be a proxy to the team's attention to detail. Usually, effort put in by the Team, is inversely proportionate to #rug risk
(Not to mention, the Art itself can also be something of value)@takashipom
Alpha Leak. It is very possible that $SFI, @saffronfinance_ is currently undervalued. Most people farming it are putting their funds into the Tranche S, rather than A. Thinking that they will probably get more SFI from S tranche. However that is not exactly the case ATM.
Intuitively, it is easy for people to assume that they will get more SFI tokens in S tranche because its receives 95%, while A tranche only gets 5% of the emissions.
Take for example, since the DAI pool receives 75% of the liquidity mining tokens per epoch
Out of the 15,000 that's 11,250. S gets 10,687.5 and A gets 562.5 SFI.