Here's an interesting table that takes #CosmosEcosystem#crypto and compares the amounts being unbonded to the total circulating supply, as well as to the currently unbonded supply. If you hold $KUJI in particular, but also $JUNO, $AKT or $SCRT you may want to read below:
1. So, a fairly safe assumption is that any coins being unbonded are doing so to predominantly be sold. Some may be being moved to DeFi or liquid staking protocols, but I think that's a small percentage.
2. By staking a coin, it's taken out of circulation for a while. The pool that can be bought/sold becomes smaller, and therefore any buy or sell pressure has a stronger effect on price.
3. If we look at $AKT, there's an amount unbonding equal to 11.7% of the currently unbonded tokens. That's a lot - if it's sold quickly it'll definitely dump the price. However, having 87.7% bonded means people are overall confident in the project and therefore likely to buy dips
4. The same goes for $JUNO and $SCRT where there's amounts unbonding that are large compared to the unbonded amounts, but small compared to the total circulating supply.
5. $KUJI on the other hand, has a large amount unbonding (9.68% of unbonded supply) which is also a large amount of the total supply (5.98%). This almost certainly means a long-term drop in price.
6. More on $KUJI. There has been a pretty large pump over the last 24-48 hours. Consequently, looking at the unbonding info, there is a massive amount that has just been unbonded and will hit the markets on 24OCT22.
As always, I hope you've enjoyed this tangent. Got a crypto mate? - tell them about me :)
Thank @PostTenebras2 for picking up an error in the total supply. The original table had the last half exaggerated due to pulling the wrong data. Corrected version:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After reading the revised Atom 2.0 roadmap (7400 words), here is my overview of the essential concepts within, summarised in 22 tweets.
•The Cosmos Network is an association of autonomous communities connected economically and ideologically with the Cosmos Hub.
• The vision of the Cosmos Network, as laid out in 2016, (1/24)
has been realized with the creation of a secure software stack for building and connecting application specific blockchains.
• The needs of the interchain have evolved, and accordingly, (2/22)
On $JUNO halvening:
Assuming market cap remains the same, all inflation does is take some value from all JUNO holders (like tax) and redistribute it to the stakers. Less inflation means the unstaked holders lose less value, and the staked holders get less returns.
Mini thread:
The spreadsheet where you can play with the numbers yourself is below. In summary, if all other factors don't changed stakers will receive roughly 9% less return per year. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
And for anyone who is wondering why I've used 28% as the $JUNO inflation, read this previous thread of mine from waaaaay back: @Bro_n_Bro , @mintscanio & @SmartStake still use the wrong numbers for inflation / APR :(
Here's how the top 10 #OsmosisZone pools stack up after factoring in inflation, fees, APRs & incentives.
Green = better than staking
Red = worse than staking
Read on for a link to my spreadsheet and explanation/notes.
Observations:
-Staking $OSMO is still bad. Stride MEV won't make much of a difference ($2k a day extra income split between all stakers is less than 0.1% extra)
-Pooling $EVMOS, $ATOM and $JUNO worse than staking.
-Pooling $STARS, $CRO or any AXL tokens good. USDC/OSMO pool great
Why is this different to Dexmos / APRs? Because it accounts for inflation. (as well as pool fees, external rewards etc). Basically, if you have 10% APR, but inflation is more than 10%, you're losing money. As you can see, not accounting for inflation gives very different returns.
Rebus is a chain built on Cosmos SDK and using Tendermint consensus (like everything else in the Cosmos Ecosystem). It's aimed at bringing TradFi banks and investors into Crypto. Let's start with a few assumptions on which Rebus success is based.
[...]
Assumption 1: Crypto will grow substantially. This is fair, as crypto MC is 5% of S&P500 MC and 10% of gold MC. $BTC in itself is about 5% of gold MC.
I agree with this assumption - however, chains that have growth potential without total crypto MC growing are better.
[...]
Firstly, a disclaimer. After compiling what I needed to see, I bought a small high-risk-high-return $Kuji bag a few days ago as mostly a long term hold. This isn't a shill, it's me "placing my money where my mouth is". Maybe your assessment of the situation will be different.
1. #Kujira is a project that has migrated to its own chain after the #Terra collapse. It's now a sovereign chain, splitting #DeFi offerings into into #dApps which provide order-book, liquidation and staking/governance capabilities.
I'm sensing a bit of $JUNO hype again. Some people are calling for a return to ATH; 9x from here. My take is based on the graph below (JUNO vs ATOM). Its ATH was 1.5x $ATOM, with plateaus either side at around the 1:1 area. I wouldn't be surprised if it regained parity soon...
... but I'd be surprised if $JUNO moons without more money coming in and raising the atom price concurrently.