In a legal first, the delivery by the Chief Justice of a summary of the Court's findings was transmitted live on YouTube.
With countries like France and the Netherlands having second thoughts on CETA, the potential legislative path to ratification may not be straightforward.
With commendable restraint, the successful plaintiff Patrick Costello TD @costellop terms the outcome 'very interesting'.
He's not wrong.
As @MaryCarolanIT says: 'The decision is of enormous significance, not only for Irish constitutional law, but because it involves the first pronouncement by a court of any EU member state concerning the deal, particularly the investor court provisions.'
John Rogers SC for Mr Costello had told the Supreme Court during the hearing that this was the most important case the court would hear this year regarding the constitutional rule of law in the State.
This shows once more the vital importance of judicial oversight of political actors. You can see why some political actors do not like it.
Checks and balances matter. Ireland, for all we criticise, is luckier than most countries in this. #IrishConstitution#JudicialReview#CETA
Charleton J.
- CETA ... "constitutes a clear disregard of the Constitution."
@Costellop:
.. a significant moment in protecting the integrity of our courts system & constitution. This case raised important questions in relation to binding legal mechanisms which would grant corporations greater ability to potentially sue the State. patrickcostello.ie/2022/11/11/sta…
Taoiseach (as reported by RTÉ):
....a point of law has been raised which the Government will respond to.
Tl;dr
What a Supreme Court Judge sees as "a clear disregard of the constitution" is a Taoiseach's "point of law." #Reductive #ceta#Law#Politics@Costellop
Hogan J
The issues which arise on this appeal go to the very heart of our constitutional architecture. All of this means that the present appeal may yet be regarded as among the most important which this Court has been required to hear and determine in its almost 100-year history
‘When he announced he was taking the case Costello was savagely attacked by Government TDs and he was treated as a traitor.
Privately, TDs were mocking him and branded him as an embarrassment’
‘We’ll be considering the implications of this one for quite some time, quipped one Government source.’
- IT
“It does seem to me that this is the WTO protests from 20 years ago in another guise,” said one member of the parliamentary party. “They’ve latched onto the environmental movement but it’s really just a long-standing, hard-left, anti-trade thing.”
- Unnamed GP legislator, via IT
“… clear disregard of the Constitution” - Charleton J.
“… incompatible with the democratic nature of the State…” - Baker J.
“The issues which arise on this appeal accordingly to go to the very heart of our constitutional architecture.” - Hogan J.
SCt: Combined effect of Arts 9(2), (3) & (4) #Aarhus is that states must ensure that proceedings in which decisions granting development consent are challenged for non-compliance with national law relating to the environment are not prohibitively expensive courts.ie/acc/alfresco/6…
WWN: The government celebrated its confidence vote win by ramming through a planning bill which every single interested party that isn’t a money grabbing developer has labeled ‘a disaster’. @WhisperNewsLTD waterfordwhispersnews.com/2022/07/13/gov…
WWN smashes embargo😂
The vote doesn't happen until after debate that begins this evening at 7.09pm & ends around half nine.
The government hammered through the suspension of standing orders earlier today - a move needed because the late changes are o/s the scope of the Bill.
Watch this morning's episode unfold in our real time thread - almost as good as Being There and with echoes of Stranger Things
‘It is difficult to escape the conclusion that the amendments are being rushed through to avoid controversy, negative media coverage, and the requirement to actually explain what is at issue.”
- @Mickcliff
‘Again.’
- Me
“On Thurs. evening opposition politicians were given details of 48 pages to be added to a 20-page planning bill. 2.5 hours have been set aside on Wednesday to debate these along with amendments from the original bill. It will be impossible for proper Dáil scrutiny to be applied.’