ExcelInEd *seems* safe because they’re moderate relative to crazy Dixon-type book ban howls today and have impressive array of moderate funders you’d expect from a Bush-led org.
And as an org in many ways they are. I’d take them over @BetsyDeVos any day.
3/
But the policies they push are DeVos-lite, and in a sense more destructive because harder to see their extremes.
It was impossible to work on MI #edpolicy circa 2014-15 in the lead up to 3rd grade passage without dealing with them.
4/
Point is: outside groups have always taken interest in #miched and as here, much of within-state far-Right policy agendas from #azed to #floridaed are nationally coordinated strategy cloaked in ground-level parents rights rhetoric.
5/5
❌ Third, related to villains is stoked fear:
✔️ perceived threat to way of life
✔️ fear of “the other”
✔️ imagined threats to own children coupled with willingness to actually put them at risk
🧵🪡
It’s a big edu/policy research conference week (#APPAM2022#ASHE2022#UCEA22) and here’s a short thread on ideological diversity in edu-research and edu-journalism #edchat using the Greene/Heritage studies as a hook
1/
Some formal edu research/journo communities have tolerated increasingly far-Right stuff for years, in part because of a genuine commitment to multi-perspectives, and also out of fear of being labeled ideological or against free speech themselves
2/
And in the #edchat journalism space there is some of the notorious #bothsides pressure too, to give voices to the Heritages and Catos if the world.
This is why people like Corey DeAngelis routinely are quoted as expert researchers when they’re really political activists
Voucher “empirical” research showing positive academic effects are no less a political tactic than this piece of garbage here—and by the same organizations.
Whitmer actually vetoed the plan originally a year ago. And as early as then, the state GOP didn’t expect to win the #migov (save for a more recent post-primary fever dream) in #Election2022