My starting point is the second #MeToo moment in economics itself, where new and old cases have emerged, and female academics simply had enough.
But I was also intrigued by the economic research on sexual harassment, looking at costs (huge), labour market effects (awful), internal firm dynamics (somewhat encouraging) etc.
I am also very grateful to Anna (not her real name) for sharing her story with me. It takes a lot of courage to do that, and helped me (and hopefully our readers) to appreciate the viciousness of sexual harassment.
Here are the papers. @johannarickne and @OlleFolke on whether victims of sexual harassment leave the workplace and what they are willing to give up to be free of it. (And lots more, it's 3 papers in 1.) drive.google.com/file/d/1Ma0U6i…
Another paper on the compensating wage differential of sexual harassment. It adds up to a whopping $9.3m per filed case (in today's $) in the US. By @Joni_Hersch. law.vanderbilt.edu/phd/faculty/jo…
A paper, slightly tangential to sexual harassment: how do bosses react to #misconduct? Do men tolerate male misconduct more than women do? Mark Egan, Gregor Matvos and Amit Seru have the answer. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
Was curious whether #hydro power in Europe will make a comeback in 2023 (after a bad 2022), so I wrote a little explainer. economist.com/the-economist-…
European #water reservoir levels in 2022 were very low. They are slowly recovering, in part because policy forced a refill.
The shortfall of #hydro power is remarkable, 112 TWh less to date in 2022 than in 2021. And this is largely a flexible source of generation that often drives out marginal plants like #gas.
In short: let's fund furlough schemes SURE-style at the European level, because national bazookas are unfair. faz.net/aktuell/wirtsc…
@ThierryBreton@PaoloGentiloni Very much enjoyed their subtle subtweeting of Germany's track record on carbon emissions (terrible) and energy policy (godawful). Nominal debt, they argue, is just one measure.
"Nominal debt excludes that each state has made decisions in the past on whether and how to pursue goals of common European interests [👋Nordstream], that then led to an uneven burden on budgets."
So the idea that Germany can continue to cultivate its national neurosis on #nuclear power and #fracking is clearly incompatible with the gas futures market.
That Annalena #Baerbock has a 74% approval rating for her handling of the #Ukraine war (it’s a war, @ZDF, not a crisis) is remarkable, esp compared to #Scholz’ dismal 50%.
Germans’ support for “heavy weapons like tanks” deliveries to #Ukraine continues to be high, though I would have hoped this to be north of 60%. SPD scaremongering has a price.
Support for Ukraine’s #EU membership, however, is surprisingly high, at 62%. The German public, IIRC, was never a big fan of enlargement. Enlargement to Ukraine would be a big deal for the EU.