How to protect #China from #Russia-like sanctions?

This question continues to be debated by Chinese analysts.

▫️ Ye Yan's solution: Beijing should build an international alliance of businesses to circumvent and neutralise Western #sanctions

A THREAD 🧵
sinification.substack.com/p/countering-w…
🔹About the author: Ye Yan (叶研) is currently a senior economist at the international R&D arm of China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and an adjunct professor at China’s Southwest University of Political Science & Law.
🔹Some background: China was taken aback by the scale of Western sanctions on Russia following the outbreak of the #UkraineWar. Government officials and experts have since been assessing how best to protect their country from such a doomsday scenario.

theguardian.com/world/2022/may…
🔹Summary of Ye's proposal:

1⃣ The increasing use of economic sanctions (both primary and secondary) and #export controls by the #USA and its allies pose a threat to China’s economic development.
2⃣ The internationalisation of the #RMB and boosting the development of China’s #tech industry are effective countermeasures that need to be pursued, but they will not protect China in the short-to-medium term.

sinification.substack.com/p/taiwan-elect…
3⃣ Acknowledging that a power gap still exists between #China and the US, #Beijing should avoid adopting tit-for-tat responses to US sanctions when it can, otherwise it risks harming itself.
4⃣ Ye’s solution: Building an international alliance of businesses (hereafter, CES network) that could both circumvent and neutralise the impact of Western #sanctions.
5⃣ Members: Companies that have already been sanctioned as well as those businesses that are after a “risk premium” and that are not afraid of being sanctioned.
6⃣ Dynamics: The more the #West uses economic sanctions, export controls and other coercive measures, the more businesses from across the world will be encouraged to join such a network and thus the more powerful this network would become.
7⃣ Advantages:

▫️ The CES network would be an inter-business, not an inter-country, alliance. This would help avoid tedious intergovernmental negotiations and the risk of diplomatic clashes.
▫️ The network would help shore up #supplychains, reduce the isolation felt by sanctioned businesses and provide new opportunities for Chinese businesses to develop and prosper through trading with sanctioned entities both within China and across the world.
▫️ It would help enhance China’s global economic and political influence.

▫️ The constitution of a CES network could become a “bargaining chip” when negotiating with the #UnitedStates and other Western countries.
▫️ The establishment of such a network could help prevent a complete #decoupling of the US and Chinese economies.

▫️ Success of the CES network would blunt #Washington’s sanctions weapon and could even lead to the collapse of the #USA's global political and economic hegemony.
8⃣ Disadvantages:

▫️ It would take time to develop and would initially require the strong support of governments from across the world.

▫️ Its emergence could precipitate the formation of two opposing camps. This would be the direct consequence of 🇺🇸's own actions, not 🇨🇳's.
9⃣ Additionally:

▫️ #China's non-sanctioned multinational companies should be encouraged to comply with US sanctions, provided that by doing so they are not harming China's core national interests.
🪧Quote:

"After the formation of a CES network, the US will in a sense be ‘digging its own grave’ by [imposing] unilateral economic sanctions.”
📣 For more insights from Chinese think-tank analysts and scholars on a range of international topics, don't forget to subscribe:

sinification.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Thomas des Garets Geddes

Thomas des Garets Geddes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @thomasdggeddes

Feb 18
How should #China respond to the growing political divide between China and the West?

▫️ Yang Ping (杨平) advocates building a new international system led by China and countries in the Global South rather than the West.

🧵🧵🧵
sinification.substack.com/p/facing-the-g…
🔹The author: Yang is the head of the highly regarded Beijing Cultural Review (BCR). He is also the director of the Longway Foundation which publishes BCR. The foundation describes its publication as “the most influential magazine of intellectual thought and commentary in China”.
▫️ Yang’s views in a nutshell:

1⃣ “Capitalist politics” are no longer in line with “capitalist economics”. The former now undermines globalisation, while the latter supports it.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 16
🪧 Remember #XiJinping encouraging #CCP members/diplomats to show a “fighting spirit" and his repeated emphasis on "being good at struggling"?

What this implies is still being debated in #China.

Below is a 'moderate' take by one of China’s most respected US specialists:

🧵🧵🧵
🔹 Da Wei (达巍) is a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University and the director of its prestigious Centre for International Security and Strategy (CISS). Image
▫️ “The 20th Party Congress demanded that the whole of the Party ‘carry forward its fighting/struggling spirit’ ... It is important to stress that the #communist emphasis on struggle is a #Marxist philosophical concept & must be distinguished from the struggle of everyday life.”
Read 10 tweets
Jan 21
🔹Most read article on Chinese aggregator of scholarly articles Aisixiang (爱思想) over the past 30 days:

“Ten critical shifts in international politics in 2023 and their prospects” by CUHK scholar Zheng Yongnian (郑永年).

🧵 EXCERPTS
#UnitedStates:

▫️ “When it comes to international political risks, the US's domestic problems have to be placed at the top of the list ... the US’s internal divisions produce huge externalities that have far-reaching effects on world politics.”
▫️ "So, will a transfer [of the US’s domestic tensions] occur at the military level? This is even more worrying. Countries must guard themselves against this [各国不可不防]."
Read 13 tweets
Jan 20
"#RishiSunak has now become the representative of 🇬🇧's hardliners on #China. We cannot expect him to become a moderate on China again after becoming PM."

🔹 Author: Xu Ruike (徐瑞珂) – Prof. at Beijing Foreign Studies University. Image
▫️ "Under Sunak, the 'Americanisation' of Britain's China policy will remain evident ... Economics will take a back seat. Suspicion and hostility towards China will gradually become the defining theme of Sino-British relations."
▫️ "The right-wing forces of the Conservative backbenchers represented by @aliciakearns and @MPIainDS will exert significant influence on Downing Street's China policy."
Read 5 tweets
Jan 20
TOP Read on Aisixiang (爱思想) – CUHK scholar Zheng Yongnian discusses 10 international risks and challenges facing #China in 2023. These are:

1⃣ The US’s political polarisation, domestic tensions and their potential repercussions on the world and China.
sinification.substack.com/p/top-read-int…
2⃣ The war in Ukraine and the risks posed by a nuclear war.

3⃣ The ‘NATOisation’ of Europe and NATO’s increasing interest in the Indo-Pacific.

4⃣ The growing risk of a nuclear crisis on the Korean peninsula.
5⃣ Rising tensions in the Middle East and their potential impact on China.

6⃣ #India’s rise is exerting greater geopolitical and economic pressures on China.

7⃣ Latin America’s political polarisation creates uncertainties for Beijing.
Read 5 tweets
Nov 25, 2022
🇺🇸 Tech and supply chain strategy:

“The US's incremental adjustments allow resources to continue to be channelled into 🇨🇳 through ‘third countries’, ‘detours’ or even ‘transfers’, thereby allowing 🇨🇳 to make adjustments and repairs to its supply chains.” – Ma Xue, CICIR analyst.
“The US does not have a complete monopoly on cutting-edge research ... This means that unilateral US controls are often ineffective and the paths for technology transfers to #China are difficult to block."
"Political controls placed on strategic industries will undermine 🇺🇸's future tech competitiveness. US export controls, entity lists and other similar restrictions have reduced the sales of US companies to 🇨🇳 and [thus] reduced the revenues that can then be reinvested in R&D."
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(