🔹About the author: Ye Yan (叶研) is currently a senior economist at the international R&D arm of China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC) and an adjunct professor at China’s Southwest University of Political Science & Law.
🔹Some background: China was taken aback by the scale of Western sanctions on Russia following the outbreak of the #UkraineWar. Government officials and experts have since been assessing how best to protect their country from such a doomsday scenario.
1⃣ The increasing use of economic sanctions (both primary and secondary) and #export controls by the #USA and its allies pose a threat to China’s economic development.
2⃣ The internationalisation of the #RMB and boosting the development of China’s #tech industry are effective countermeasures that need to be pursued, but they will not protect China in the short-to-medium term.
3⃣ Acknowledging that a power gap still exists between #China and the US, #Beijing should avoid adopting tit-for-tat responses to US sanctions when it can, otherwise it risks harming itself.
4⃣ Ye’s solution: Building an international alliance of businesses (hereafter, CES network) that could both circumvent and neutralise the impact of Western #sanctions.
5⃣ Members: Companies that have already been sanctioned as well as those businesses that are after a “risk premium” and that are not afraid of being sanctioned.
6⃣ Dynamics: The more the #West uses economic sanctions, export controls and other coercive measures, the more businesses from across the world will be encouraged to join such a network and thus the more powerful this network would become.
7⃣ Advantages:
▫️ The CES network would be an inter-business, not an inter-country, alliance. This would help avoid tedious intergovernmental negotiations and the risk of diplomatic clashes.
▫️ The network would help shore up #supplychains, reduce the isolation felt by sanctioned businesses and provide new opportunities for Chinese businesses to develop and prosper through trading with sanctioned entities both within China and across the world.
▫️ It would help enhance China’s global economic and political influence.
▫️ The constitution of a CES network could become a “bargaining chip” when negotiating with the #UnitedStates and other Western countries.
▫️ The establishment of such a network could help prevent a complete #decoupling of the US and Chinese economies.
▫️ Success of the CES network would blunt #Washington’s sanctions weapon and could even lead to the collapse of the #USA's global political and economic hegemony.
8⃣ Disadvantages:
▫️ It would take time to develop and would initially require the strong support of governments from across the world.
▫️ Its emergence could precipitate the formation of two opposing camps. This would be the direct consequence of 🇺🇸's own actions, not 🇨🇳's.
9⃣ Additionally:
▫️ #China's non-sanctioned multinational companies should be encouraged to comply with US sanctions, provided that by doing so they are not harming China's core national interests.
🪧Quote:
"After the formation of a CES network, the US will in a sense be ‘digging its own grave’ by [imposing] unilateral economic sanctions.”
📣 For more insights from Chinese think-tank analysts and scholars on a range of international topics, don't forget to subscribe:
🔹The author: Yang is the head of the highly regarded Beijing Cultural Review (BCR). He is also the director of the Longway Foundation which publishes BCR. The foundation describes its publication as “the most influential magazine of intellectual thought and commentary in China”.
▫️ Yang’s views in a nutshell:
1⃣ “Capitalist politics” are no longer in line with “capitalist economics”. The former now undermines globalisation, while the latter supports it.
🪧 Remember #XiJinping encouraging #CCP members/diplomats to show a “fighting spirit" and his repeated emphasis on "being good at struggling"?
What this implies is still being debated in #China.
Below is a 'moderate' take by one of China’s most respected US specialists:
🧵🧵🧵
🔹 Da Wei (达巍) is a professor of international relations at Tsinghua University and the director of its prestigious Centre for International Security and Strategy (CISS).
▫️ “The 20th Party Congress demanded that the whole of the Party ‘carry forward its fighting/struggling spirit’ ... It is important to stress that the #communist emphasis on struggle is a #Marxist philosophical concept & must be distinguished from the struggle of everyday life.”
▫️ “When it comes to international political risks, the US's domestic problems have to be placed at the top of the list ... the US’s internal divisions produce huge externalities that have far-reaching effects on world politics.”
▫️ "So, will a transfer [of the US’s domestic tensions] occur at the military level? This is even more worrying. Countries must guard themselves against this [各国不可不防]."
"#RishiSunak has now become the representative of 🇬🇧's hardliners on #China. We cannot expect him to become a moderate on China again after becoming PM."
🔹 Author: Xu Ruike (徐瑞珂) – Prof. at Beijing Foreign Studies University.
▫️ "Under Sunak, the 'Americanisation' of Britain's China policy will remain evident ... Economics will take a back seat. Suspicion and hostility towards China will gradually become the defining theme of Sino-British relations."
▫️ "The right-wing forces of the Conservative backbenchers represented by @aliciakearns and @MPIainDS will exert significant influence on Downing Street's China policy."
“The US's incremental adjustments allow resources to continue to be channelled into 🇨🇳 through ‘third countries’, ‘detours’ or even ‘transfers’, thereby allowing 🇨🇳 to make adjustments and repairs to its supply chains.” – Ma Xue, CICIR analyst.
“The US does not have a complete monopoly on cutting-edge research ... This means that unilateral US controls are often ineffective and the paths for technology transfers to #China are difficult to block."
"Political controls placed on strategic industries will undermine 🇺🇸's future tech competitiveness. US export controls, entity lists and other similar restrictions have reduced the sales of US companies to 🇨🇳 and [thus] reduced the revenues that can then be reinvested in R&D."