Nukes and #iran, what could be done to stop that (by #USA or #Israel)?
With a high chance of a kinetic outcome to the Iran #nuclear ambitions, lets see what could happen.
@CommandDevTeam Lets understand the criteria for mission accomplished. I assume the following:
a) Nuclear Material Stocks are split between two hardened and well defended Fuel Enrichment Plants (FEP)
b) These two are assumed to be the hardened underground facilites at #Natanz and #Fordow
@CommandDevTeam Natanz is located at 33°43′30″N 51°43′30″E and hardened, underground and strongly defended by Anti Air Artillery (AAA) and Surface to Air Missles (SAM).
This site is vast, with over 100,000 m², and very well protected, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_f…
Actual Picture, 3rd March 2023:
Fordow is a second, hardened underground facility located at 34.8845°N 50.9981°E near the city of Qom.
This site is also well protected by AAA and SAM sites, and is known to host key areas of the iranian nuclear programme. See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fordow_Fu…
Actual Picture, 26th Feb 2023
For both sites, we make the same assumptions:
a) USA and Israel KNOW the internal layout and storage locations
b) Protection of SAM consists of modern iranian SAM systems, namely 1 of Bavar-373 (Bn) and 4 Bty of Khordad 15 per site
Bavar 373:
c) The design of the GBU-57 MOP is sufficient to destroy the hardenend underground facilities, but no other US conventional Bomb will be able to "get the job done"
As we can see here, it really is in a class of its own:
So how does this look like? Well, look at this 4k 60fps Video of a B-2 dropping two GBU-57 MOP, possibly the best quality footage of either you will ever get to see:
In such a mission, looking at the map, we can see both facilities (marked green!) are deep inside Iran.
The only plane able to carry the required GBU-57 MOP is the B-2 Stealth Bomber, a highly secret asset of the US Air Force, one where a loss is absolutely not allowed.
This sets the entire gameplan for the mission:
"How can the USA safely get B-2 carrying "MOP" over the sites, while mitigating any possible risk?"
Can it be "undetected"? Can it escape iranian fighters?
Where does it fly in? At which time does it strike best?
Without going into "crazy" detail, this is MY theory of a likely avenue of approach.
Barely 250 Miles from Iraq, where US will be able to safely refuel/operate and have support assets like AWACS, SIGINT and EW.
Which assets are likely to be employed?
Assets are dictated by the tactical execution, I assume:
- REZONANS sites must be disabled ahead of "time on target"
- Anti-Stealth radars in-place, manual targeting of SAM, means that SAM sites at the FEP need to be destroyed
- Air Supremacy and SEAD must be in place
The first phase of strikes, in my assumption, will be covertly launched stealth cruise missles, namely JASSM-ER, vs Rezonans and key sites.
As hinted before, the US needs to move B-2 250 miles into Iran, without any ability for Iran to see it or shoot it down.
US will likey use 3 B-2, one for each site, one spare over Iraq in case of Mechanical issues or so.
These will be protected by either F-22 or F-35.
I do not believe US will aim to enter iranian Airspace with non-stealth Aircraft. The EA-18G Growler may be the sole exception as superb EW and SEAD platform, using AGM-88E AARGM, successor of "HARM".
US Fighters would fly out of Al-Udeid, towards the relevant area in Iraq.
As diversion, a possible attack could be done by US Planes against the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant.
This could be done by striking defenses and adjacent military airport, but not harming the actual NPP, as USA would likely want to avoid contamination.
NPP, 28th February 2023
The direct action would likely be preceded by a massive JASSM strike, either by bombers that arrive from USA, or F-15 etc, that can carry 5 JASSM each.
Targets would be red X: Isfahan, Hamedan and Dezful (Shahid Vahdati Airbase), to mitigate any iranian Fighters from there.
With that out of the way, the US could move in along the purple corridor with B-2s covered by F-22 and F-35 and electronic warfare, engage the FEP and get out.
US CAP would have to ensure nothing gets out of Teheran area (blue).
Additionally, one can expect the Area of Operations (AO) to have multiple RQ-180 "secret stealth drones" over Iran, to ensure US has every "base" covered with sensors for its real-time killchain.
It totally does not exist, so please delete this picture.
Additionally, I believe the US would have a sizeable strike package in Iraq and Gulf, to be able to "plaster" the country with JASSM if anything unforseen happens.
B-1 Bombers carry 24 JASSM each, and have long legs, so they are likely to be useful for this, IF in the area.
As summary:
I believe the US can pull this off, with as little as 3 B2, a bunch of F-22, F-35, plenty of support, and about 250+ JASSM(ER).
Israel would be a close partner on this, but in regards to "sabotage" "oops, the radar is burning", intel and agents on the ground.
I am concerned that this will be the "next" stage of escalation.
One could wonder if such activity "could by chance" be used to disrupt the command and control of the iranian regime, and coincide with a revolution attempt.
We can only hope.
I would also like to point out that US has some interesting assets in Kurdistan.
Harir could be a base where the US will stage a Quick Reaction Force, incase something goes wrong. Apaches, Ospreys and such.
One thing that I forgot when posting this thread:
REZONANS mentioned before, is a long range Anti-Stealth Radar system.
This would need to be taken out, which is where I may presume the aforementioned usage of massive JASSM strikes with Rapid Dragon
The "big" thing on this video is:
They must be western saboteurs, because they use SIG Sauer MPX 9mm Submachine guns, previously not seen in the war.
We can indeed see 9mm MPX,these are indeed Sig Sauer MPX 9mm Magazines.
Notice something? They are empty. Lets dig deeper.
Notice the gun on the right: it is being blurred in a very telling spot. This spot is where US military weapons have their UID code, a QR code used for identification purposes in the US Military since 2007. It is blurred, and only on one gun. Do you notice another thing? :)
These are pictures of the „new“ service rifle of the German army, the HK416A8.
A short thread on the gun, and how it is a good(and bad) procurement. #miltwitter
Starting from the muzzle, the first positive item:
the muzzle device is the (formerly) optional one, that was made specifically for QD mounting Surpressors built for NATO flash hiders. The grooves aid mounting and prevent carbon seize up, an excellent choice.
Next up, we can see that the barrels have a bajonet lug.
Not really useful for bajonet mounting, but still useful for other accessories.
In der Diskussion um "#ukraine / #russland " wird gerne, z.B. von @JohannesVarwick, ein Einlenken mit der "Eskalationsdominanz" durch Russland begründet.
Ein kurzer Faden, warum ich anderer Meinung bin, inklusive Begründung und Belegen:
🧵
@JohannesVarwick Welche Formen der Eskalation gibt es?
Wir betrachten zu allererst die Räume Land, Luft, See sowie den Bereich "Zivilisation".
Dabei müssen wir immer zwei Faktoren betrachten: Quantität und Qualität, also wie viel vom möglichen wird gemacht, und wie schlimm wird es eingesetzt.
@JohannesVarwick Land:
Die gesamte Berufsarmee ist im Einsatz, es wird großflächig mobilisiert. Da ist Quantitativ wenig Luft nach oben, vor allem kurz- und mittelfristig kann nicht mehr Kapazität im Landkrieg generiert werden.
As we have learned, a key factor are supply lines.
To underline that, I have combined above map with the openrailwaymap of the area.
Orange and brown are the significant railway connections of the area.
This combined map will be the basis of further analysis. #ukraine
The first initial area to look at is the area of the biggest city, Cherson.
We are going to split the map into areas of interest, Cherson being 1.
We use the approximate russian area of control to outline the sectors, as we analyze the russian situation. #ukraine
Multiple sources reported MIG-29 today, from #ukraine Air Force. One Video that matches the reports was posted at @ennolenze .
Summarizing reports, a lot can be drawn from these spottings. Lets get into it (short thread)
@ennolenze Lets start of by looking at the jet in higher resoltion.
A #mig29, very clearly. Also six missles visible.
The four outer pylons have two identical missles, the two inner pylons have identical missles.
What can we learn from the plane, and mission, from that?
@ennolenze The inner pylon missles have very distinctive wings forward, and are very "pointy".
This strongly indicates that we are looking at R-27R, a medium range, radar guided missle, NATO Code AA-10 Alamo.
The bottom missle on this picture: de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wympel_R-…
@CommandDevTeam The issue that we have is that the #ATACMS simulation shows that the "impact" type, "no warning, no pictures of missles, sudden explosion", can be explained by the hypersonic, vertical impact of SRBM.
What can not be explained is the flight time (too short) and "twin impact".
@CommandDevTeam This is the data of the missle used in this Test #2, and an overview of the "overall situation".
Exactly like yesterday, Launch at Odessa by #ukraine, Target #SakiAirBase , missle used Iskander M to "simulate" the Ukrainian HRIM-2.