▫️ 7 researchers from the Institute of Latin American Studies, which is part of the prestigious Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS).
▫️ Lead auhtor: Zhou Zhiwei (周志伟) – Director of the Centre for Brazilian Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS).
🔹Summary:
1⃣ Lula’s Brazil is seen as having fundamental political differences with the #UnitedStates.
2⃣ Under Lula, Brazil's diplomatic focus is expected to be reoriented towards the #GlobalSouth and, most importantly, away from the US.
3⃣ Furthermore, #Brazil's interests, "de-emphasis of ideology” and approach to global issues are said to be often aligned with 🇨🇳.
4⃣ 🇧🇷 is viewed as an important partner in promoting globalisation, reforming the current international order and bringing about a multipolar world.
5⃣ Beijing should therefore strive to “win” #Brasilia over as a reliable partner and “support it” in opposing “hegemonism and foreign power politics” (i.e. in opposing the #USA).
6⃣ Beijing should support Brazil’s desire to play a greater role in global affairs.
7⃣ Beijing should convince an already #BRI-friendly Lula to “participate in” (understand “sign up to”) the Belt and Road Initiative.
8⃣ The #BRICS should of course remain an important platform for China-Brazil and South-South cooperation.
9⃣ The development of economic cooperation will continue to be “the key factor determining #LatinAmerica's attitude towards China”. In this respect, China is shown to be at an advantage when compared with the US.
🔟 #Beijing should also provide “unequivocal support” for Latin American integration, strategic autonomy and “self-strengthening”.
🪧 Quote: "Especially in the context of escalating competition between major powers, Brazil should become a partner that China actively strives to win over."
📣 To receive weekly insights from Chinese think-tank and academic circles on a range of international topics, you can subscribe here:
One of the Global South's leading voices, 🇧🇷 Lula, is in #China.
Prof. Cheng Yawen argues that "🇨🇳 and develop. countries need to break the current core-periphery world order" and build a new international system free from Western interference.
🔹The Author: Cheng Yawen (程亚文) – Researcher at the School of International Relations and Public Affairs, Shanghai International Studies University.
🔹 Summary of Cheng's views:
1⃣ US-led globalisation and capitalism drove #NATO's eastward expansion. This, in turn, has been the “main reason” behind #Russia’s offensive in #Ukraine.
2⃣ Western-style globalisation is coming to an end.
🇨🇳-🇷🇺 relations have almost always been marked by a certain amount of mutual distrust.
Feng and Wen's critique of Putinism is a useful reminder that both sympathisers and sceptics of 🇷🇺 most likely coexist within the confines of Zhongnanhai.
This is what PKU Prof. Lu Feng (路风) was saying in January about foreign companies such as #ASML complying with US #chip export controls.
EXCERPTS 🧵
1⃣ “Since the #USA has used its ‘nuclear weapon’ against China, we should strike back and use our own ‘nuclear weapon’. More specifically, the US’s method of suppressing 🇨🇳 is to control the supply of chips. Well then, [in return], 🇨🇳 should and can control the demand for chips.”
2⃣ "If the US is forcing a tech and industrial #decoupling [from #China], then we should impose sanctions on all the foreign companies that are carrying out these orders to decouple from the Chinese market.”
Fudan Prof. Jian Junbo (简军波) discusses the European Union's #StrategicAutonomy, 🇪🇺-🇨🇳 relations in 2023 and provides his government with a few suggestions.
1. Benefits the development of #EU-#China relations by freeing the EU from the influence of “third parties” (i.e. the US).
2. In line with China’s desire for a multipolar world order.
However...
3. EU strategic autonomy also has a strong anti-#China element to it.
📢 “It is a double-edged sword for 🇪🇺-🇨🇳 relations and is to a certain extent an important causal factor in the conflict over 'values' between China and Europe."
"#Beijing and #Moscow’s 'unlimited' friendship has alarmed the west. But imagine for a moment: if two countries vow to develop their friendship, then how could they place limits on it?" 2/7
"Two of Beijing’s contributions have been particularly under-appreciated. First, not adding fuel to the fire. This war has served to prove that however close #China and #Russia might be, this is not an alliance." 3/7