Pandit Vishnu Digambar Paluskar (1872-1931) was a Hindustani classical singer. Paluskar stood up to Maulana Mohammed Ali Jauhar who opposed his musical performance in the Kakinada session of the #IndianNationalCongress in 1923 #history#heritage#music#Maharashtra
Paluskar has sung the original version of 'Raghupati Raghav Rajaram' & arranged 'Vande Mataram' India's national song. He is also credited with ensuring that #music & musicians secured the respect that they deserved.
This thread is based on the writings of social reformer & journalist Prabodhankar Keshav Sitaram Thackeray. Prabodhankar, the father of late #ShivSena supremo #BalThackeray wrote about Paluskar on 17 October 1942.
Prabodhankar says that there was a time when musicians & music concerts were looked down upon by the social elite. It was considered a sin of sorts for women from so-called "good" families to develop hobbies like singing.
This changed when Paluskar launched his Gandharva Mahavidyalaya at #Mumbai (September 1908).
Paluskar held a concert in #Mumbai where women from families of judges, govt servants & barristers performed. It began with a rendition by Balakrishnabuwa Ichalkaranjikar, who was Paluskar's guru. It was a houseful event.
Pandit Paluskar had attended #Congress session at Coconada (Kakinada) in 1923. After Congress president Maulana Mohammed Ali Jauhar came to the venue accompanied by a band, Panditji and his disciples, who were waiting on the stage, began singing the 'Isha stavan'
Mohammed Ali and his brother Shaukat Ali, formed the famous 'Ali Brothers,' and were the vanguard of the Khilafat movement. Two arterial roads in #Mumbai are named after them.
At the Kakinada session, Maulana Mohammed Ali objected to the playing of musical instruments and questioned if this was a Hindu temple or the site of a music concert. He asked for the music to be stopped.
An angry Pandit Paluskar retorted: 'Why is isha stavan being opposed in the pandal of the Rashtra Sabha (Congress)?... if the president is so put off by musical instruments, why did he come to the venue in a procession which included a band and musicians with instruments?'
Paluskar asked why isha stavan music was being opposed. He said: 'Let's see who opposes me now.' After this, he sang his patent 'Jai Jagadish Hare' in a crescendo for five minutes. The audience was captivated. As he started singing 'Vande Mataram,' thousands stood in attention.
Prabodhankar says Pandit Vishnu Digambar Paluskar sang the isha stavan and Vande Mataram in the three days of the session and returned to #Mumbai like a victorious #Maratha warrior!
Dr #BabasahebAmbedkar was a student at the Columbia University. After reading reports about the plans for a statue, he wrote to the Bombay Chronicle (founded by Sir Pherozeshah Mehta in 1910), opposing the idea of a state as a memorial + #AmbedkarJayanti2023#AmbedkarJayanti
Ambedkar said leaders like Mehta and Gopal Krishna Gokhale had "grappled with many of our problems" and were "entitled to everlasting gratitude for the zeal and sacrifice with which they represented our cause." But a memorial in the form of a statue was "very trivial & unbecoming
As a student in one of the biggest universities of the USA, #Ambedkar said he was "thoroughly convinced of the place a library has in the intellectual and social development of a people." He urged the 'Bombay public' to consider the construction of a library as "the fittest and
The element of time is crucial in a city like #Mumbai where things move on the dot & distances are measured in terms of time taken. Did you know that the city once had its own time zone & Sir Pherozeshah Mehta, the #Congress politician resisted attempts to change it? #history
Sir Pherozeshah Mehta (1845–1915) was a #Parsi politician & lawyer known as the Lion of #Bombay. On 3 April, Mehta's statue outside the #BMC headquarters will complete 100 years. Mehta was among those who sought that #BombayTime, a seperate time zone for the city be maintained
Before the official Indian Standard Time was introduced, British India had the #Madras & #Mumbai standard times. The #Madras time was half an hour ahead of that in #Bombay. Some govt offices followed the #BombayStandardTime or #BST, while some followed the #Madras standard time.
True. People come to Mantralaya in droves to meet ministers & babus. This is because there is no formal grievance redressal mechanism in the state. At the local level, the administration is busy with rent-seeking. No govt has the will to introduce a formal system for people to +
get their problems redressed. Why should they travel all the way to Mumbai from far-off corners of the state for problems that can be redressed at the taluka or district level? In Mantralaya, they are allowed entry only after 2pm. The rights of passage include a huge queue
If they are unable to meet a minister or babu, they have to leave dejected or stay overnight in Mumbai, which may be beyond their means. The problem here is, there is a massive gap between the rulers, esp the senior bureaucracy & IAS officers, & the ruled.
Vinayak Damodar Savarkar is one of the most complex personalities in recent history. Read this thread to know more about #Savarkar, the man, revolutionary and #Hindutva demagogue.
Unfortunately, when the debate is polarised between the extremes of black & white, it does not do justice to the complex personality of #Savarkar as a man, revolutionary, reformer, #Hindutva ideologue & an accused in the assassination of #MahatmaGandhi.
What makes #Savarkar stand out among his contemporaries is his strong hero complex bordering on narcissism, and the extreme and often contradictory elements of his personality.
While in the Ratnagiri jail, where Savarkar was shifted in 1921 from the Cellular jail in the Andamans, he wrote his seminal work ‘Essentials of Hindutva,’ which laid the foundations of Hindutva as an ideology.
It laid emphasis on cultural nationalism as against a territorial one, and said that India was for the Hindus alone, and not for the Muslims or the Christians.
Speaking before a group of students in 1938, Dr Ambedkar stressed that it was the responsibility of both, the husband & wife to ensure family planning. A smaller family would enable better financial planning, ensure that women can maintain their health & help them divert their
energies elsewhere.
In 1938, Prabhakar (P.J) aka Dadasaheb Roham, a legislator from Dr Ambedkar's Independent Labour Party (ILP) tabled a bill in the Bombay legislative council seeking family planning. This was with Dr Ambedkar's support.