It's over! The Content ID lawsuit against YouTube brought by composer Maria Schneider is dismissed, with prejudice, the weekend before the start of the trial.
If you recall, the lawsuit was filed in 2020 and focused on the lack of broader access to copyright management tools, such as Content ID, for independent musicians and creators.
Maria Schneider and others filed the class action against YouTube and Google in an attempt to claim the current system supports piracy, while boosting profits for YouTube, and can't handle repeat infringers.
Last month, I covered the denial by the court to certify a class, which led to a re-assessment of the scope of the trial by the parties. It seems over the last few weeks, there were exchanges and ideas from both sides about what should and shouldn't remain as the trial loomed.
An attempt to dismiss some of those claims without prejudice on Saturday would have allowed any dismissed claims to proceed at a later date if chosen. However, it seems that changed, too.
In the latest dismissal filed on Sunday, the claims are dismissed with prejudice, meaning it's the end of the road for this matter after three years of litigation.
The case is Schneider v. YouTube, LLC (3:20-cv-04423)
District Court, N.D. CA.
A complaint has been filed against the @SECGov alleging the agency violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by failing to release unredacted transcripts of 2019 interviews with Mark Zuckerberg in his capacity as CEO of Facebook (now Meta).
There’s more… 🧵
If you recall, the deposition took place in 2019 following the Cambridge Analytica scandal involving the release of data to third-party app developers.
Facebook was hit with a $100 million fine by the SEC related to misleading investors about the severity of the issue.
The complaint alleges that since beginning requests for a full release of materials in November 2021, the SEC failed to ever comply with the FOIA request and follow-up requests.
The SEC cited personal privacy exceptions under FOIA.
The Federal Trade Commission just released a new blog post that expands on the recent complaints against Amazon & Ring by providing some practical takeaways when it comes to AI tech, including natural language processing, and the collection, storage, & use of biometric data.
🔐 Be mindful of privacy when training and developing an AI tool. The FTC's enforcement authority under Section 5’s unfairness standard looks to both the benefit AND the cost to consumers for AI solutions.
That's the Act. To be fair, it does say that the Federal Trade Commission has enforcement power over whether or not the above disclaimer is included with any synthetic media.
🛑 But, how can this be it?
It leaves many unanswered questions, such as:
❓ What is the manner in which this disclaimer must appear? As a watermark on a photo or during a sound output? Within the metadata (if so, where)? At the end of a text output?
Q1 2023 filings for publicly traded #creatoreconomy companies leave me with one takeaway: ad revenues continue to decrease across numerous companies as advertiser spend is clearly slowing down.
Meta - 17% YoY drop in average price per ad, but they served more ads (26% more YoY)
Roku Inc. - 1% drop YoY in revenues
Both Roku and Spotify refer to the "macro" environment, with Roku explicitly pointing to industry data that shows "the total U.S. advertising market down 7.4% YoY."
It will be interesting to see how this expands into all areas of the creator economy.