I wrote a while ago about how much of the law around police behavior - the law that essentially excuses preemptive violence almost all the time - is predicated on a false presumption of black dangerousness. But I'm thinking about another part... salon.com/2014/10/31/why…
White America is deeply invested in two seemingly contradictory projects: (1) Embracing "post-racialism" and a self image as racially egalitarian; & (2) Maintaining entrenched residential and educational segregation. How can this be done?
White people need to believe in a race-neutral justification for the status quo of segregation. In the case of education, that justification is the seemingly dispassionate, mathematical truth of test scores. "We don't care about race, we just want great schools."
In the case of residential segregation, the justification is safety. "We don't care who our neighbors are, we just want safe streets." The problem there is that the vast majority of segregated, non-white neighborhoods are basically safe.
They're not as safe as white neighborhoods, but they're still mostly safe. So putatively non-racist segregation needs a narrative of danger. Police and their backers offer that narrative, through a regimen of training that literally treats every human interaction as a threat.
Our whole legal approach says, in very reasonable-sounding, official ways, "These neighborhoods are so dangerous that we need to give police untrammeled discretion to kill." That makes voluntary white segregation seem like the only responsible choice for white families.
And since most white people don't really know many black or Latinx people or spend real time in non-white neighborhoods, the myth of those neighborhoods' being prohibitively dangerous is easy and useful to believe. It lets them double down on inherited racial privilege...
under the unexamined assumption of safety and responsibility. When the Sacramento cops who killed Stephon Clark get off without real punishment, as they likely will, white people can assume that there must be some good reason that the legal system allows cops to act this way.
That is a much easier assumption, because it says, "Your self-segregation is rational and not racist. Carry on."
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Objection! Calls for speculation.
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!