Nope. P-values are good for what they’re designed to do. Just because they’re (often) misused doesn’t mean that we should abandon them.
No. Bayes factors *can* be useful, but they’re not always the solution to p-value limitations.
Uh-uh. A study isn’t inherently “bad” if it’s not pre-registered. But it’s more likely to be bad if *pretends* to be
No siree. I’ve seen plenty of researchers with far more talent than me have a long string of rejections. LUCK + hard work = success
Nah. Unless you’re competing for the exact same grant, a success for your lab mate is a success for you. Don’t you want to be in a successful lab?
Probably not. Ideas are everywhere, but very few people have the resources and persistence to follow through and execute them. Get feedback early! Better to say something wrong in a preprint than a published paper...
Incorrect. Some of my best research ideas have come from these ‘unrelated’ talks. There’s always *something* you can take away from a talk.
Untrue. That frustration I get when I can’t find an article from an obscure journal my rich Uni doesn’t happen to have a subscription to is what most academics experience all time. If you can’t afford #OA, then preprint.
False. One of my best academic decisions was taking the time to learn R. It’s flexibility and reproducibility far outweighs the occasional frustration.
Also, GIFs.
Nope. I changed my mind about these nine other things from stuff I read on Twitter, and now I write better manuscripts.
Open science: @chrisdc77, @jessicapolka, @ceptional
Stats: @lakens, @krstoffr, @EJWagenmakers, @wviechtb
General: @hardsci, @deevybee, @Neuro_Skeptic
Stats: soundcloud.com/everything-her…
Open science: soundcloud.com/everything-her…
Preprints: soundcloud.com/everything-her…
Work/life balance: soundcloud.com/everything-her…