Actually I've done some research on several of them.
People need to decide for themselves. While the amorphous evil left consists mostly of overzealous protesting students, I would submit that this is an organized network with specific goals.
Richard Fink, Charles Koch's ideological advisor:
"What we needed to do was build the foundations for a spontaneous order for freedom that included a multi-faceted integrated 'structure of social change'..."
According to Fink, funding university centers and selecting the right faculty we're keys to this process.
Academics pushing for those policies became their 'sales force', witting or unwitting.
"VIEWPOINT DIVERSITY"
A generic, manufactured academic crisis that professors of all ideologies could rally around.
politico.com/magazine/polit…
Witting or unwitting salesman, I suppose he has to answer that for himself.
My contention is that the dangers posed to academic free speech by this network are far greater than the disorganized (ocassionally misguided) student campus activities.
Let's all show our cards and discuss this in an open forum.
Why hide your ideological intentions? What are you afraid of? Do you think if the branding is pulled off, the Marketplace will reject your ideas?