Here’s a very interesting situation.
Will human rights and the interests of the general public in clean water; or corporate demands win out here?
In the Corporate States of America its usually the big money corporations that get favoured.
Lets hope that won’t be the case here.
Will human rights and the interests of the general public in clean water; or corporate demands win out here?
In the Corporate States of America its usually the big money corporations that get favoured.
Lets hope that won’t be the case here.
If Dakota Access Pipe Line did not legally own the land, then Clean Water protestors were not trespassing on DAPL land.
Protestors were injured in the very aggressive assault on the protestors. Was this on instruction of local or federal police or done by police privately hired
Protestors were injured in the very aggressive assault on the protestors. Was this on instruction of local or federal police or done by police privately hired
Police used water cannons in below freezing weather on the Clean Water #DAPL protestors; as well as tear gas and rubber bullets that caused serious injury.
Over 300 people were injured.
It was like something you’d expect in a vicious totalitarian police state.
Over 300 people were injured.
It was like something you’d expect in a vicious totalitarian police state.
When govts start restricting free speech (which inherently includes the right to peaceful protest) to protect certain interest groups; its a short trip to totalitarian police state-ism.
Intimidation and attack by police on the #DAPL Clean Water protestors occurred under the Obama admin - as did the attack on Ferguson protestors (those protestors included outside agents provocateurs that engaged in acts of violence - a situation then used as an excuse to attack)
