"Selectively ignoring the robust evidence that contradicts you may win you a debate in the eyes of the general public [about MOND]. But in the scientific realm, the evidence has already decided the matter, and 5/6ths of it is dark." 👏👏👏
instagram.com/p/BlvCnDpA6ft/
(The instagram text got truncated, this is from @StartsWithABang blog post; link below)
Basically: if it can't recreate the success of cosmology, it *doesn't work*. Period.
Dark matter: 1
MOND: 0
forbes.com/sites/startswi…
Disclaimer: I think it's important that scientists look at all options, including MOND. All possibilities should be explored to solve the DM problem. But my comment stands: if it can't explain cosmology, it can't work. And until it's able to, I'll not see it as a viable solution.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Sophia Nasr 🏳️‍🌈
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!