I’m very curious to see more commentary on this document. Charges are stunning. But the narrative also seems shot through with conservative vs progressive/pastoral battles in the church. Made me wonder what shld be taken at face value.
2/ read through this passage (entire portion captured here) to get some sense of what I’m referring to ... 
3/ Few other thoughts here. First, this is way outside my domain. But even a cursory, outsiders read of this document makes clear the author is speaking from a factional/ideological perspective in the church that is quite hostile to the direction of Francis’s pontificate.
4/ That of course doesn’t mean his claims are wrong or invalid. But real caution seems warranted in taking the core accusations at face value.
