What's alluring about Yongbyon would be the limitation of tritium production, especially if verifiable. Of course, that's a far cry from what the 9/19 Pyongyang declaration suggests.
I'm maybe too cynical, but its inclusion in the declaration seems purely instrumental to incentivize the US to return to high-level talks/a second summit. It'll work in that sense.
This tweet should have followed in this thread:
From Yonhap: "...a 5 megawatt-electric reactor, a radiochemistry lab also known as a reprocessing facility and a nuclear fuel rod production facility -- are mentioned as the first to be destroyed." (Where are they mentioned?) english.yonhapnews.co.kr/northkorea/201…
"The United States is expected to show more interest in the uranium enrichment facilities than in the dilapidated plutonium production facilities." Don't forget the trit!
