Imagine covering the White House and seeing a fellow journalist be insulted, smeared, lied about in a doctored video and banned by the Trump admin.
And then denouncing the journalist in a BBC article excusing Trump.
This is disgraceful, @Maitlis. 🔽
And then denouncing the journalist in a BBC article excusing Trump.
This is disgraceful, @Maitlis. 🔽
The article does not mention:
* what Acosta asked and fact-checked (the caravan and Russia probe, FWIW)
* whether Trump answered his questions
* the White House sharing a deceptive video apparently lifted from InfoWars to slime him
All relevant to the topic at hand, no?
* what Acosta asked and fact-checked (the caravan and Russia probe, FWIW)
* whether Trump answered his questions
* the White House sharing a deceptive video apparently lifted from InfoWars to slime him
All relevant to the topic at hand, no?
Not to mention, the prose is execrable.
In an unnecessary and pretentious display of throat-clearing, she starts paragraphs with: “But make no mistake,” TWICE.
But worse than the lousy arguments and shoddy writing is the failure of solidarity from a member of the pool.
In an unnecessary and pretentious display of throat-clearing, she starts paragraphs with: “But make no mistake,” TWICE.
But worse than the lousy arguments and shoddy writing is the failure of solidarity from a member of the pool.
“EMILY, YOU’RE FANTASTIC! KEEP GOING!” - Trump in a signed photograph that the author of this hit on Acosta, according to her reflections here. standard.co.uk/comment/commen…
