@uriklarman @bloXrouteLabs So all that to say "we encrypt the blocks and will relay from anyone", which doesn't in any way address the issue. Sure, in theory one pool can relay the block for another pool because the other pool is getting censored by bloxroute, but, why would they?
@uriklarman @bloXrouteLabs Worse still, obviously all pools will disable any kind of multi-hop-to-get-to-bloxroute stuff because it just costs them money in terms of relay time (we've seen pools do wayyyyy worse for financial reasons, like turning off validation wholesale)!
@uriklarman @bloXrouteLabs So you're relaying blocks in a much, much, much less efficient way than things like FIBRE, all because "we might censor" without materially addressing the centralization issue which inherently results in it.
@uriklarman @bloXrouteLabs Hell, you're arguing people should build blockchains that rely on centralized services like boxroute, what happens if, say, bloxroute decides it can increase monitization by charging more for relay, easy to add another token to do that!
