*AOC says a ton of mock-worthy & factually-challenged things during a major news interview*
*Conservatives criticize substance of what she said*
*Gateway Pundit has an idiotic post based on her nickname in college.*
MSM: Conservatives are focused on attacking AOC for her name!
*Conservatives criticize substance of what she said*
*Gateway Pundit has an idiotic post based on her nickname in college.*
MSM: Conservatives are focused on attacking AOC for her name!
If you're going to use the standard of judging a whole group but the worst people who claim to be on the same side, then you better use that standard for both sides.
Otherwise you just look like a dishonest hack.
Otherwise you just look like a dishonest hack.
How many MSM journalists tweeted about AOC being called out for declaring that facts aren't important if you feel like you are morally right?
Now compare that to how many are now tweeting about Hoft posting some article attacking her for using a nickname in college.
Now compare that to how many are now tweeting about Hoft posting some article attacking her for using a nickname in college.
Not only does this give AOC a free pass against substantive criticism, but also gives GP exactly what he wants: Hoft gets free clicks and access to audiences he otherwise wouldn’t have reached. MSM happy to give it to him if it means covering for her & smearing the right.
P.s When the ratio of those dismissing dumb criticisms of AOC and engaging in substantive criticism vs those attacking a dance video or her name is 1000:1 and the media still suggests the 1 is representative of the right, it discourages the right from policing their own
