,
11 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
Seriously, fuck Stefan and fuck anyone who likes him.
That is all.
Yours sincerely,
A psychologically healthy biracial dude in an assault-free interracial marriage
That is all.
Yours sincerely,
A psychologically healthy biracial dude in an assault-free interracial marriage
Getting a lot of “these are just facts” replies from Molyneux fans.
Are they facts? Could be. But Moly isn’t just discussing facts. He’s arguing against interracial marriage.
I don’t bring up my personal info to prove him wrong. I do it to say that this is me & fuck the haters.
Are they facts? Could be. But Moly isn’t just discussing facts. He’s arguing against interracial marriage.
I don’t bring up my personal info to prove him wrong. I do it to say that this is me & fuck the haters.
There’s a certain kind of person who loves making “logical” arguments for shit like white ethnostates or women not being in the workplace, but when you tell them to fuck themselves cry “nOt aN aRgUmEnt, lOoK aT mUh sTaTiStiCs, wHy aRe yOu ScArEd tO dEBatE mEeEe?”
Fuck that noise.
Fuck that noise.
Debate whatever you choose.
But trying to engage & refute certain arguments can just be playing a bigot’s game.
If someone wants to statistically argue the Holocaust was good, should I try “prove” them wrong with facts? Or in doing so do I legitimise it as a topic to be debated?
But trying to engage & refute certain arguments can just be playing a bigot’s game.
If someone wants to statistically argue the Holocaust was good, should I try “prove” them wrong with facts? Or in doing so do I legitimise it as a topic to be debated?
Debating isnt a magic bullet solution to bad ideas. Debating is a skill. It can be hard to out-debate skilled talkers, populists, unhinged ppl or chronic bullshitters.
Ben Shapiro would probably trash most of us in a debate. That doesn’t necessarily make his ideas correct.
Ben Shapiro would probably trash most of us in a debate. That doesn’t necessarily make his ideas correct.
Comments like this (& there are many) miss the point.
Stats aren’t the enemy; they are what they are & they can be uncomfortable. Sometimes they’re misleading.
The problem is shitbags using stats to justify & further their odious ideological perspectives.
Stats aren’t the enemy; they are what they are & they can be uncomfortable. Sometimes they’re misleading.
The problem is shitbags using stats to justify & further their odious ideological perspectives.
Stefan Molyneux: “The Left is breeding a generation of fragile snowflakes”
Also Stefan Molyneux: Terrified that feminism and race-mixing will annihilate white men
Me: Fuck this guy
Stefan Molyneux: “This person is screaming verbal abuse at me”
Also Stefan Molyneux: Terrified that feminism and race-mixing will annihilate white men
Me: Fuck this guy
Stefan Molyneux: “This person is screaming verbal abuse at me”
Are there many things more pathetic than an Indian guy heroically sticking up for a white nationalist obsessed with denigrating brown people?
I say no
I say no
You know Molyneux has quote-tweeted you when your mentions are full of these guys
The dudes in my mentions today are basically like this, but also racist
This is the sort of shit I've been talking about.
Arguing with those who think "interracial marriage is bad & I can prove it with stats" is like arguing with a computer; able to process reams of data yet unable to comprehend the concept of humanity.
Arguing with those who think "interracial marriage is bad & I can prove it with stats" is like arguing with a computer; able to process reams of data yet unable to comprehend the concept of humanity.
