, 3 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
@pablogerbas @yudapearl I am not claiming applied researchers trained in SCM list the 150,000 variables. Often, they content themselves with (not very defensible) backdoor strategies. But that is an error. I'm saying that instead that should often search for quasi-experiments.
@pablogerbas @yudapearl No one is disagreeing that once you have a quasi-experiment, a DAG can be a good way of clarifying it and determining how to transform it into an estimation strategy (although I think @yudapearl sometimes overstates the absolute necessity of doing this).
@pablogerbas @yudapearl The question is whether the search for the quasi-experiment should come first, pre-DAG. And it seems to me that it must. The reason I emphasize this is because I think this pre-DAG step is *the* critical step in credible causal inference.
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Jason Abaluck
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!