,
11 tweets,
5 min read
Read on Twitter
@rwac48 Convincing to ordinary people may be who lack knowledge not so convincing at all for Air force officials of world. I will give full marks to author for trying though. Should I dissect now ?
@rwac48 1. Author is unaware that there are sort of pins required that need to be punched every hours in F-16s which helps Lockheed Martin track the Jets so they can't be taken to US/NATO enemy countries. If any shot down they will know as no more pin asked by Pak.
@rwac48 2. If India has shot down F-16 then PAF will at all costs get the black box of F-16 deciphered which only Lockheed Martin itself does and holds key information of what happened, no such request placed with Lockheed Martin nor Black box sent. Got evidence ? present it.
@rwac48 3. Yes, DG ISPR did say two pilots at first and then one. It was a confusion caused by two units who reached and got same pilot(Abhinandan) and Abhinandan was taken to CMH. Lets assume DG lied and there were two pilots or three actually. How sure are you the others are not Indian
@rwac48 4. Pakistan has already claimed and had one pilot whose videos were uploaded by locals on social media is it plausible Pakistan realized that if we claim the other one that will have to be returned as per Geneva convention too, IAF is not claiming hence we can keep him forever
@rwac48 5. Regarding preposterous claim of author assuming Hassan Siddiqui is the actual pilot that might have lost life. Siddiqui is JF-17 pilot, I myself posted his video from his bunk with crew the moment he landed back. Its not the viral video authors talking about.
@rwac48 6. Nauman Ali Khan being praised is for the SU-30 kill. Why Siddiqui was more praised was because his kill needed no evidence as Abhinandan was captured and Mig-21 in Pak territory hence Siddiqui got visible praise. Nauman's SU-30 kill has less visible evidence but strong overall
@rwac48 7. F-16s were used and I made whole thread on them that they can be used against India, there is no such clause in end user agreement that they can't be used against India. AMRAAM shown by IAF is exploded meaning it did indeed hit the target.
@rwac48 8. If DG ISPR had not said that we didn't use F-16s then IAF had not displayed the AMRAAM on media which proves SU-30 kill :D Traps and ambushes, something apparently IAF failed to understand and thought they will show it to US to say look they used F-16s. Which are allowed ;)
@rwac48 9. Regarding AWACS picking up F-16 signals. Oh C'mon Pakistani F-16s have superior ECM(Electronic Counter Measures), Radar Jamming and EW (Electronic warfare) capability. Proof ? Your air defense couldn't even determine MI-17 helicopter correctly and shot it down.
@rwac48 10. R-73 is not exploded as it explodes in proximity of target, only motor part is burnt due to crash as they were with MIG-21 when it fell and caught fire.
