FBI Agent [to a person of interest, after appropriate warnings]:
"Were you at First Central Bank between 10 and 11 am on Tuesday, August 3rd, 2016?"
Person of Interest: "Not at all! I was in South Carolina, boarding the Big M Riverboat, for a day of gambling with friends."
FBI Agent: "Let me show you a video taken inside the bank on the date and time in question." [shows video clearly depicting the person of interest in the bank, video date, and time stamp confirms date and time].
FBI Agent: "Stand up and turn around, I am placing you under arrest on suspicion of violating #18USC1001."
That's it. Lie to the federal government? It's a crime.
There are actual, real r#efugees who #legitimately#fear#persecution by their government, or by groups their government does not or cannot control, in their home country.
They are lawfully permitted to seek #asylum in third countries, including the USA.
But here's the tricky part: asylum applicants are put into a different track of treatment than others that simply seek to migrate to America for their own economic benefit.
Asylees have the concern of both domestic and international law to protect them from harms at home.
So, now, we have thousands, hundreds of thousands, of economic migrants that have been advised and directed by various organizations to frame their movement to the USA as "fleeing" danger at home.
I AM NOT SAYING ALL SUCH CLAIMS ARE LIES.
But we know that the terribly sad death of a dad and infant daughter this week came at the end of a trek in which husband, wife, and daughter, against the urging of grandmother, traveled north toward the US "#becausetheywantedtheirownhome."
When they arrived at a port of entry, they were not immediately processed, the first step in making a claim for #asylum. Rather than waiting their turn, they took to the damning waters of the #RioGrande.
Sadly, terribly, their decision cost the lives of dad and daughter.
But here's the thing.
If they were #honest about their #reasons for coming to the USA, their asylum #application would, like most such applications, eventually have been #denied.
Because
"wanting your own home"
while a perfectly honorable desire is not grounds for a grant of asylum.
And, if they did as some NGOs urge economic migrants to do and misrepresented the cause of their migration, they would have violated Title 18 USC 1001, a federal crime.
I'm not looking to hang the deceased dad. This situation is terrible and untenable.
But I'm not going to sit by and keep my yap shut while #lyingliars in the #lapdancemedia and the #Congress attempt to pin these deaths on America, generally, or the President, specifically.
FBI Agent [to a person of interest, after appropriate warnings]:
"Were you at First Central Bank between 10 and 11 am on Tuesday, August 3rd, 2016?"
Person of Interest: "Not at all! I was in South Carolina, boarding the Big M Riverboat, for a day of gambling with friends."
FBI Agent: "Let me show you a video taken inside the bank on the date and time in question." [shows video clearly depicting the person of interest in the bank, video date, and time stamp confirms date and time].
FBI Agent: "Stand up and turn around, I am placing you under arrest on suspicion of violating #18USC1001."
That's it. Lie to the federal government? It's a crime.
There are actual, real r#efugees who #legitimately#fear#persecution by their government, or by groups their government does not or cannot control, in their home country.
They are lawfully permitted to seek #asylum in third countries, including the USA.
But here's the tricky part: asylum applicants are put into a different track of treatment than others that simply seek to migrate to America for their own economic benefit.
Asylees have the concern of both domestic and international law to protect them from harms at home.
So, now, we have thousands, hundreds of thousands, of economic migrants that have been advised and directed by various organizations to frame their movement to the USA as "fleeing" danger at home.
I AM NOT SAYING ALL SUCH CLAIMS ARE LIES.
But we know that the terribly sad death of a dad and infant daughter this week came at the end of a trek in which husband, wife, and daughter, against the urging of grandmother, traveled north toward the US "#becausetheywantedtheirownhome."
When they arrived at a port of entry, they were not immediately processed, the first step in making a claim for #asylum. Rather than waiting their turn, they took to the damning waters of the #RioGrande.
Sadly, terribly, their decision cost the lives of dad and daughter.
But here's the thing.
If they were #honest about their #reasons for coming to the USA, their asylum #application would, like most such applications, eventually have been #denied.
Because
"wanting your own home"
while a perfectly honorable desire is not grounds for a grant of asylum.
And, if they did as some NGOs urge economic migrants to do and misrepresented the cause of their migration, they would have violated Title 18 USC 1001, a federal crime.
I'm not looking to hang the deceased dad. This situation is terrible and untenable.
But I'm not going to sit by and keep my yap shut while #lyingliars in the #lapdancemedia and the #Congress attempt to pin these deaths on America, generally, or the President, specifically.
File your complaint with the California Bar. Identify Eric Swalwell as the subject and identify offering falsified evidence to the Court of Impeachment as violating his duty of candor.
File your complaint with the Maryland bar. Identify Jamie Raskin as the subject, and offering false statements of fact as a violation of his duty of Candor to the Tribunal.
Last month, the @HouseDemocrats impeached Donald John #Trump. When they did so, they adopted a resolution proclaiming that their impeachment was done in the name of the #HouseofRepresentatives and in the name of, and for, the United States of America.
That formula, explaining that the House impeached someone and did so in the name of the House and in the name of the United States, is common. Yet the assertion is troubling.
Half or more of the country disapproves of the House’s impeachment, and of the Senate’s trial.
But politicians will still claim they are doing it for us.
They aren’t.
And it is particularly urgent that we repudiate the idea that the House’s 2021 #impeachment of #DonaldTrump was in our name.
Despite #historicalrevisionism (that's a polite way of saying lies), #public#symbolic#lynching holds a distinct and honored role in establishing the conditions necessary to the independence of these former British colonies.
Colonists enraged by repeated abuses conducting #lynches in #effigy of #Crown officials, often accompanied by "funerals for Liberty" in which, having been carried in a coffin to a prominent town location, seemingly deceased, Lady Liberty would rouse from her nightshade slumber.
To clarify, the Senate is NOT required to employ the services of the Chief Justice in the conduct of an impeachment trial except when the President is on trial.
Excepting presidential impeachments of #Clinton and #Trump, the modern Senate has impeached through a process in which the matter tried in committee, rather than before the whole Senate, and then and submitted to the Senate for ultimate judgment by the entire body.
In fact, this method was used in the modern impeachments of federal judges @RepHastingsFL and #WalterNixon.
The following is from my Facebook memories for this date in February 2013:
[Hint: The distinctly anti American approach odd the foreign policy described below marks this as a chapter from the Obama Zone:
To be clear: if you are a captured #AlQaeda operative, with #operationalintelligence regarding an imminently #pendingattack on US forces, property, personnel, or citizens, you have the promise of this administration that you will not be #waterboarded.
OTH, US citizens, if a "high ranking" government official concludes that you "pose a threat of imminent attack against the US," if you are difficult to capture, and if the laws of war are unoffended thereby, you may be #vaporized by a #droneattack.
Remember, America's political philosophy is that we are created with rights ... to life, to liberty, and to the pursuit of happiness ... that are inalienable.
In the nature of things, these are #politicalrights, that is, they continue to exist and they continue to be affects of our intended design.