Thread by @Staedtler

It needs a complete revolution in journalism, allowing independent thought instead of these claustrophobic "sources".

There's nothing wrong with sources if they can provide valid information.
But I've been watching the English media, and they haven'y provided a scrap of valid information in the last three years.

Because English journalism is entirely dependant on English politicians, and English politicians haven't got a clue what the fuck is going on with Brexit.
It's all junk.

Everything from English politicians is junk because they just cannot accept what Europe is telling them.
And so, English journalists who rely on Political junk end up producing junk news.

I got Brexit right from the beginning. Europe would define Brexit, and then It would never go through parliament, and Theresa May would resign.

Nobody told me that. And plenty enough people said I was wrong. Nobody told me, I just worked it out for myself.

And that's what English journalism has lost the ability to do - to think independently of political posture.
They've become hopelessly dependant on gossip, and for the last three years they've been giving you the wrong answer.

The whole logic of Brexit was wrong from the beginning. It always relied on the co-operation of the European Union in what they regard as a hostile act.

It's not that you're not "allowed" to leave. But there are huge consequences that this country won't accept because everyone told them they could have Brexit for free.

And the point is, it was obvious to anyone from the very beginning that it was never going to work.
All you had to do was to accept what Europe was saying, and treat it as valid information. But so much of English journalism refused to do that. And so they got it wrong.