,
12 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
Wade Robson and James Safechuck are probably very well connected with these CSA victim organizations through their law firm who run a business 100% based on CSA allegations. I wouldn't be surprised if Finaldi asked 1in6org to post something in support of Wade and James.
They are bothered by Chappelle's comedy because it destroyed their protection: that they were not to be criticized or challenged because being "vIcTimZ".
So far they managed to hide behind this wall of protection where people are afraid of even thinking critically of anyone claiming to be a victim because of MeToo. So by getting these orgs behind them they intend to keep up that pressure, while their line of defense is cracking.
And Safechuck needs to come up with a new PR trick. Posting half nudes of himself and pics with his child - and in times of big distress apparently the nuclear weapon of combining the two - is transparent af. That photo is completely unrelated to the content of his post.
BTW, how cowardly of a man you have to be to hide behind real victims of CSA and YOUR OWN CHILD as a line of defense from criticism? No amount of pics of your child will make it go away that your story in LN is often completely contradictory with your story in your lawsuit.
No amount of pics of your child will make the train station lie go away.
No amount of pics of your child will make it go away that while you claim in public that you aren't interested in money, you bend over backwards in court to be able to sue companies for money that you had nothing to do with.
No amount of pics of your child will make your creepy description of alleged CSA go away, in which you sound completely like someone who never actually experienced CSA. themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2019/09/01/lea…
Safechuck's acting was so bad that even Reed felt the need to defend it in this creepy way. This is when Reed goes into that NAMBLA-speech of CSA in itself not being the traumatic thing, but they only get traumatized as adults due to the secrets they have to keep. 
Apparently this NAMBLA-narrative is the defense of Safechuck smirking through graphic descriptions of CSA as if it was a joke. That's because his allegations really are a joke - they never happened.
And no crying isn't required to be credible. Wade tried that and he is fake as hell. But whether not crying or crying with real victims you can see the effects. The difference between these two and real victims is absolutely huge.
BTW, they claim to have PTSD. How come, when we are told that the sex abuse wasn't actually traumatic and that they remember it as a pleasant memory? So from what exactly do they have PTSD then?
