, 19 tweets, 4 min read Read on Twitter
ADVERSE INFERENCE - let’s get comfy with that term.

It’s a legal term that basically means, in civil court (not criminal court): if you refuse to answer questions or provide documentation, we’ll assume the worst.
lexisnexis.com/uk/lexispsl/co…
It can also mean: if you destroy evidence, we’ll assume the worst.
Schiff recently used this term in his Giuliani subpoena: “Your failure or refusal to comply with the subpoena, including at the direction or behest of the President of the White House, shall constitute evidence of obstruction of the House’s impeachment inquiry...
...and may be used as an adverse inference against you and the President.”

oversight.house.gov/sites/democrat…
Ted Lieu has also been touching on this:
Some other things that I think merit adverse inference in the context of public sentiment:
-refusal to produce financial documents
apnews.com/f8a06b08c19245…
-refusal to allow us to see tax returns
politico.com/story/2019/04/…
-refusal to allow us to know details of the Helsinki meeting
usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
-refusal to allow us to know details of calls with Putin
cnn.com/2019/09/27/pol…
-refusal to allow us to know details of calls with MBS
politicususa.com/2019/09/27/the…
-refusal to speak with Mueller
nbcnews.com/video/mueller-…
-destruction of evidence
rollcall.com/news/congress/…
-refusal to allow us to see White House visitor logs
politico.com/story/2018/07/…
Reminder: impeachment isn't a criminal proceeding. It's a constitutional and political process. Therefore, adverse inference is totally fair game.
While you’re reading, you should also look at the Nixon articles of impeachment. Article 1 is entirely about obstruction. When Trump and his enablers refuse to cooperate, there is still recourse.
There’s adverse inference, and obstruction, both of which can serve as evidence for articles of impeachment.
watergate.info/impeachment/ar…
If you think that obstruction doesn’t carry enough gravitas, consider that Nixon resigned before they could even take a vote on the articles. Article 1 was the longest of the three.
law.cornell.edu/constitution-c…
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Sara Danner Dukic
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!