Follow here!
homeland.house.gov/activities/hea…
americanimmigrationcouncil.org/advocacy/state…
Here's "Lucia's" story. HUGE trigger warnings, sadly.
After CBP sent them back under MPP, they were held captive by a sexual predator.
CBP sent them back again. This time they were kidnapped and repeatedly raped.
Camila was sent back to Mexico under MPP with her son, where she faced repeated bouts of homelessness.
On their way to court, they were almost kidnapped, making them miss their hearing. They got ordered deported.
Rosalia was sent back to Mexico under MPP with her 2-year-old daughter. They starved for days after being returned, with her daughter so week she fainted repeatedly.
They missed court because of transportation issues.
We begin with Subcommittee Chair @RepKathleenRice, who says people are forced to "wait in conditions that are just as dangerous as the ones they fled."
c-span.org/video/?466576-…
"With barbed wire fences and security managed by private companies, they are closed to the public."
She is right! Here's more from @AILANational
aila.org/advo-media/iss…
Higgins then talks about the increase of families arriving at the border, calling it a crisis.
We haven't seen the estimates that generated this figure, and it's very unlikely these people were asylum-seekers.
He says "MPP ends the economic incentive of making a meritless asylum claim," but in reality, MPP prevents even the strongest cases from winning their cases.
I hope the witnesses can help him realize these errors.
He's going to learn a lot of facts today!
He then moves on to paperwork problems with the MPP process, including claims that CBP fabricated hearing dates. Here's more. latimes.com/world-nation/s…
I hope he pays attention to today's witnesses. With that opening, I worry he won't.
We'll see if Homan loses his temper again today.
She says MPP deprives Spanish-speaking migrants of their right to a fair hearing. She says the ABA is the only NGO which has had a tour of the Brownsville tent courts.
She notes hundreds of documented kidnappings in cities like Matamoros.
She says US lawyers are *prohibited* from meeting with their clients after the hearing.
During one incident, armed men rolled into a refugee camp where she was meeting her clients. She had to leave for her own safety.
"This is not meaningful access to counsel."
"The horrors in Matamoros are almost endless. ... Over 1,000 people screened by advocates, more than half report being kidnapped, or extorted, or raped."
Here's more on those awful conditions. apnews.com/337b139ed4fa4d…
- A child with down syndrome sent back under MPP
- A deaf, mute non-verbal woman sent back under MPP
CBP repeatedly breaks its own rules. She is so right.
He says that "As a medical expert I regularly witness the direct impact of MPP."
One woman was horrifically raped in Honduras. At the border, she was suffering severe depression and hyper-vigilance. MPP made everything worse for her.
He is stuck in Tijuana, where he has no access to mental health-care or medication. He's reverted to soiling the bed at night and has constant nightmares.
Here's information about that. abajournal.com/news/article/u…
"The Union stands by Mr. Stephens," he says.
He says "we categorically deny" allegations that this is just a disagreement over politics, and says the objections "are based in our oath."
He also suggests that the removal of head of asylum operations John Lafferty was done to get him out of the way.
"Our officers are dismayed. They ask me to implore this committee to please intervene to put a stop to this injustice."
He's reading a statement off a paper. He sounds bored.
I have debunked this time and time again. It's just false.
Knowles says he is aware of the media account, but he doesn't have personal knowledge of it.
Amazing to hear that testimony.
More on that: buzzfeednews.com/article/hameda…
He notes multiple studies on the effects of trauma on kids and says the long-term health consequences will be significant.
Homan has no special knowledge about MPP, by the way. He left long before it started. I probably know more about MPP than he does.
I've been to one of those shelters. It was tiny, had no safety wall, limited running water. The people running it were great, but it was inadequate.
He calls her "good lady" and says she has a right to her opinion.
She pushes back on shelters, saying in Matamoros there are no shelters and people are living in tents.
Vela notes there are dozens and dozens of stories of similar conduct.
He did thank her several times for telling her story, but it really came off that he did not believe her.
Powerful words from the Chairman!
She says: "What Remain in Mexico has done is take a small pebble of law [INA section 235] and create a wrecking ball out of it."
She notes the serious lack of counsel, the total limits on access to counsel in general.
Rogers expresses incredulity, but the State Department itself has noted this is true.
Good grief. What condescension.
Rogers—clearly not here to learn.
Meanwhile, Ms. Thorn Vela is testifying that MPP has caused serious delay problems at the ports of entry.
Knowles says morale has "plummeted ... because of the way we've been treated" and because they've been totally locked out of the planning process.
She says yes, and notes a recent decision in an @sdACLU lawsuit case about this. aclusandiego.org/aclu-asylum-se…
She should talk to Rep. Rogers, who just kinda ignored that.
Homan spouts off a bunch of confusing data (some of it wrong, e.g. him again repeating the 87% miss court false claim), and suggests that we need to deter asylum seekers.
Homan, again, has no clue what he's he talking about. Denial rates have been rising sharply in recent years.
She says "We have to get real numbers."
I agree! I did the work! Here's the numbers! americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/immig…
If you want more background on why Homan and others get this wrong, check out my op-ed. wsj.com/articles/trump…
Homan claims that families started coming in 2013 because of DACA.
Homan's opinion, by the way, is utterly unsupported by the evidence. Many people have studied this. It's supposition.
The argument for this goes that causing direct harm to families is good, because it prevents a greater harm.
I want them to articulate this. Justify yourself, Homan.
Just totally wrong.
Yes!
He then mentions "Wet Foot/Dry Foot," noting it allowed thousands of Cubans to get citizenship, and calls for humanity towards children.
The answer is that it's both. Both men are right.
Peña says yes, noting lack of access to simultaneous interpretation making many unaware of what's happening in the proceedings.
Rep. Lee says MPP creates an "atmosphere of cruelty."
Ms. Thorn Vela agrees, saying she's there frequently.
Here's an article on that. theintercept.com/2019/10/04/u-s…
She asks Ms. Thorn Vela to describe the dangers people are subject to in the state of Tamaulipas (designed by the State Dep't as Level 4 danger, the worst).
I'll do you one worse; INSIDE the office.
We know at least a few people have had this happen!
She asks Michael Knowles if there's any way that DHS leadership would not know about the atrocities of MPP.
"I can't imagine they would not know," he says.
@RepEscobar is right. DHS leadership knows.
"Madame Chair, Mr. Homan has brought us to the heart of the problem. This administration concludes that asylum seekers are criminals. They are not criminals. ...
@RepAlGreen is right. It's the criminalization of asylum seekers that lead to this.
He then lists cities in the US "which are more likely to be subject to violent crime than Mexico City"—which is not in Tamaulipas! It's hundreds of miles away. OMG.
If you're confused about the legal aspects of MPP, @immcouncil has a fact sheet for you coming out ASAP! Stay tuned!