, 9 tweets, 2 min read
My Authors
Read all threads
If I borrow, I am responsible to pay back.Thus I am very careful when I take debt

If I am a CEO, and I borrow, it affects my Company profitability, thus I am responsible

If I borrow as an elected official, I am only responsible for maximum 8 years. This is important to note
There are few nations that do not borrow

Debt is simply upfront consumption. When you borrow, you are essentially saying you want to use future revenues today

Hence you create a vacuum of revenue in the future. The rationale is borrow, create wealth today, cover future vacuum
Thus If you borrow today and invest in a non income generating activity, you leave that future income vacuum intact.

Hence the term ROI, that seeks to measure how much return any investment will accrue to cover future obligations

but let's get specific
If I create a scale of preference of 10 projects in Nigeria to borrow to fund....what will be my criteria?

Only 1....ability to cover that future income vacuum.

I simply rank projects in that order. eg

1. Coastal railway
2. Refinary
3. Tolled 4th Mainland bridge
4..etc
What about borrowing for Schools and Hospitals?

I won't borrow for that...why? because I earn taxes. i will deploy 100% of my taxes to cover Social Services and Development Goals because those are "non income" generating projects...aka zero coupon investments.
So where the project can fund itself and repay its future income vacuum, I borrow and lock in revenues to a sinking fund to repay.

Where the projects will not generate "returns" that are directly financial eg investing in a DNA lab, i use my tax revenues.

Simple
Hence, apply this rationale to the list of projects listed under the $30b loan

Will a Coastal Railway repay its future income vacuum? Yes

Will a digitized NTA repay its future income vacuum? we dont know.. we dont even know anyone will watch TV in 20 years. Technology evolves
Thus would it be a great idea to only fund projects that can repay by that project itself?

Can we transfer that $500m from NTA to fund an inland port in Lokoja?

Trade and moving goods by ships on water will never change.

I think it's worth a relook
Remember, when elected officials borrow, they don't repay...their children who take over power will repay that income vacuum.

Let's not burden our kids with loans that are going to be repaid from taxes.

Regards
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Enjoying this thread?

Keep Current with Kalu Aja

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!