A tiny glimmer of sanity:
Male pedophile, convicted for attempted receipt of child pornography following previous conviction for possession of child pornography and failure to register as a sex offender will NOT be referred to as a woman.
THANK YOU.
Male pedophile, convicted for attempted receipt of child pornography following previous conviction for possession of child pornography and failure to register as a sex offender will NOT be referred to as a woman.
THANK YOU.
Good look there, defending a male pedophile who masturbated to pictures of children being raped.
His tender feminine sensibilities might be ruffled if he isn't referred to as "she". That would be so rude.
His tender feminine sensibilities might be ruffled if he isn't referred to as "she". That would be so rude.
Also, isn't it rude to deprive this male pedophile of the opportunity to change his name to a woman's name?
How is he supposed to order more child pornography once he gets out of jail if he has to use his same old male pedophile name that has a criminal record attached to it?
How is he supposed to order more child pornography once he gets out of jail if he has to use his same old male pedophile name that has a criminal record attached to it?
Male pedophile Norman Varner wanted his name changed to “Kathrine Nicole Jett”. He sued for the court to retroactively change his sentence. This would have falsified reality to make it appear as if a woman had been sentenced for possession of child pornography.
NO.
NO.
Oh and male pedophile Norman Varner who wishes to be referred to by female pronouns obtained his name change illegally and lied about it under oath.
Because pedophiles are devious and manipulative like that, always hiding things and lying.
Because pedophiles are devious and manipulative like that, always hiding things and lying.
Convicted male pedophile Norman Varner concedes that biologically he is male, but argues female pronouns are nonetheless required to prevent "discrimination" based on his female "gender identity."
"When local governments have sought to enforce pronoun usage, they have had to make refined distinctions based on matters such as the types of allowable pronouns & the intent of the "misgendering" offender. We decline to enlist the federal judiciary in this quixotic undertaking."
"If a court orders one litigant referred to as 'her' (instead of 'him'), then the court can hardly refuse when the next litigant moves to be referred to as 'xemself' (instead of 'himself'). Deploying such neologisms could hinder communication among the parties and the court."
There's one dissenting opinion, in which the dissenting judge refers to the convicted male pedophile as "she" throughout, and quotes him saying, "I am a woman - can I not be referred to as one?".
Well fuck that for a game of soldiers.
ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/1…
Well fuck that for a game of soldiers.
ca5.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/1…
A quixotic undertaking:
Here's @NBCNews with pure disinformation, referring to male pedophile Norman Varner
1) as a woman
2) as "she"/"her"
3) by an invented name, NOT his legal name.
... DIRECTLY CONTRADICTING COURT RULING.
Is NBC now the pedophile rights lobby OR WHAT.
nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-ou…
1) as a woman
2) as "she"/"her"
3) by an invented name, NOT his legal name.
... DIRECTLY CONTRADICTING COURT RULING.
Is NBC now the pedophile rights lobby OR WHAT.
nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-ou…
