fisc.uscourts.gov/public-filings…
cc: @Techno_Fog ,@almostjingo , @JohnWHuber , @ProfMJCleveland , @LeeSmithDC , @themarketswork , @DevinNunes , @KerriKupecDOJ
fisc.uscourts.gov/public-filings…
But there's a bigger issue, no-one seems to be catching.
Explained to the court as an outcome of the OIG investigation and the various misstatements and omissions.
... Such that the FBI knowledge should have led to a retraction of the document as valid for the purpose of future FISA applications.
As written: "shortly after the FBI filed the Carter Page FISA Renewal" (January 12th, 2017).
Did any of these scope memos authorize Robert Mueller to investigate the claims in the Steele Dossier?
May 17th, 2017
August 2nd, 2017
October 20th, 2017
Why would Rosenstein authorize Mueller to investigate claims in May/Aug/Oct, about information in a dossier the FBI already investigated (before April) and deemed unreliable?
However, the Mueller report Pages #11 and #12 specifically says that he *did*.
justice.gov/storage/report…
scribd.com/doc/406725805
That's a full five months after the FISA application's use of the dossier that the current DOJ is claiming was invalid in April.
We saw the first authorization from May 17th, 2017:
scribd.com/document/37547…
/END