I’ll be following it live!
The hearing starts at 9:30 and will be streamed here. judiciary.house.gov/calendar/event…
- Jeremy McKinney, Second VP of AILA
- Ashley Tabaddor, President of the Nat'l Assoc. of Immigration Judges
- Judy Perry Martinez, President of the ABA
- Andrew Arthur, former IJ and fellow at CIS
She notes that recent changes in the system, like case quotas, have only made the court's dysfunction worse.
"In other areas of the law such as bankruptcy and tax, Congress established independent Article I courts where political influence over adjudicators is limited. Creating an independent immigration courts seems to me like a no-brainer."
As I've explained repeatedly, that's simply not true. Read our fact sheet here! americanimmigrationcouncil.org/research/immig…
"I have served in the Department of Justice for over 20 years." She notes that the "law enforcement focus of the [DOJ] has consistently interfered with and compromised the immigration system."
She also says they don't work. "Fiscal year 2019 is over. Did the policy reduce the backlog? Of course not!
She reveals that over 67% of immigration judges did not meet the 700 case completion quota in FY 19, and more than 99% of judges did not meet the requirements of all the case completion metrics.
She calls for ending this system and creating independent courts.
"The judge is forced to clog her docket with contested cases about children," even though another agency could resolve the case.
He begins by saying that EOIR was often inadequately funded and treated as an afterthought for years. I don't disagree with him on that.
He says that DOJ has "responded to the crisis where Congress has not," and praises Attorneys General Sessions, Whitaker, and Barr.
That's a tacit admission that the system is politicized and aimed at reducing border crossing.
Judge Tabaddor says they stripped discretion from IJs, forcing them to carry hundreds of cases which aren't ready for resolution.
Turns out that under Obama, the Center for Immigration Studies actually advocated in FAVOR of Article I courts.
I wonder what's different now.🤔
cis.org/Press-Release/…
Here's an example of that!
He asks Art Arthur what "bright line rules" and "resources" are necessary.
Arthur says more staff, judges, and law clerks are needed.
Denver lawyers make clear it's hurt due process.
Neguse then pauses to note how awful that sounds.
He then confuses the heck out of @McKJeremy by asking him if you can apply for asylum at a consulate outside the United States.
@McKJeremy pushes back, making clear the Due Process applies to "all persons," not just citizens.
She calls the message "let's just speed it up" is troubling, suggesting that this focus on speed ignores the rights of asylum seekers.
She says that @USGAO has agreed to investigate this! Did not know that.
Judge Tabaddor says "key portions" of data is being manipulated by @DOJ_EOIR.
trac.syr.edu/immigration/re…
She specifically points out data on in absentia rates.
I explained how EOIR abuses this data in my Op-Ed. wsj.com/articles/trump…
But I don't think that's a good argument against independence!
In essence, the argument is that because it would cost too much, it's not worth having an independent system.
I'm just not sure I agree with that.
She asks @McKJeremy what the current process for kids in this situation is.
That's not a practicable system!
Judge Tabbador says diversity of background is missing from current immigration judge hiring.
He says it's not true, and that asylum grant rates are higher in FY19 than in FY16 and 17.
Huh? That is not true at all.
But the grant rates have gone down, as everyone agrees.
The obvious problem with that idea is that you can't magically tell which is which—and the consequences of getting it wrong are dire.
humanrightsfirst.org/resource/immig…
Tabbador says that the court reshuffling cases is definitely cause of that, when some hearings are randomly moved forward by months, with little time to get notice to the immigrant.
She powerfully discusses how detained immigrants often can't win without a lawyer.
It's true. People with "good cases" (as Art Arthur would say) lose asylum because they don't have lawyers.
I also want to take this opportunity to share @immcouncil's statement for the record.
Read here why we think this hearing was necessary in the first place!
americanimmigrationcouncil.org/advocacy/crisi…