McConnell made a calculation.
He knows what is in the excluded evidence and he determined that allowing evidence would be more damaging than conducting a sham trial.
This tells you the evidence would be devastating.
I have a prediction . . .
He knows what is in the excluded evidence and he determined that allowing evidence would be more damaging than conducting a sham trial.
This tells you the evidence would be devastating.
I have a prediction . . .
. . . the House will continue investigating. Instead of impeaching, they will vote to censure the president, adding that they can't impeach because the corrupt Senate will just hold another sham trial.
Censure takes only a majority vote.
Imagine this . . .
Censure takes only a majority vote.
Imagine this . . .
"We have Trump's taxes and evidence that:
🔹Trump lied about his wealth.
🔹He's entirely propped up by Russian money.
🔹His wealth comes from laundering money for Russian oligarchs
🔹We censure him because we know the Senate will cover it up and conduct ANOTHER sham trial.
🔹Trump lied about his wealth.
🔹He's entirely propped up by Russian money.
🔹His wealth comes from laundering money for Russian oligarchs
🔹We censure him because we know the Senate will cover it up and conduct ANOTHER sham trial.
The House publishes the evidence. They say:
The Senate says we can't impeach in an election year.
The Senate says that they can exclude evidence in a trial.
So here, American people. You decide. Here are his taxes.
Go at it.
(Ok, Twitter Mom is kinda mad)
The Senate says we can't impeach in an election year.
The Senate says that they can exclude evidence in a trial.
So here, American people. You decide. Here are his taxes.
Go at it.
(Ok, Twitter Mom is kinda mad)
