Another set of defensive leaks to the @nytimes trying to spin the facts before the truth comes out. This has a few very interesting points in it, none of them good for the CIA.
#ButNothingsHappening
nytimes.com/2020/02/13/us/…
#ButNothingsHappening
nytimes.com/2020/02/13/us/…
The headline says it but then tries to spin away the fact that the CIA was trying to hide what it & the Russians were doing in 2016! 
Then in the fine print below Brennan's picture we learn that Brennan's false assumptions guided the accusations against Russia AND that he hid intelligence from other agencies in order to have his false narrative become accepted.
Of course this is what US Attorney John Durham is investigating, most of us have known of Brennan's role in this from previous leaks & stories!
Clashes between intelligence agencies, you don't think this might be why John Brennan created a hand picked team from CIA, FBI & NSA & refused to let the other 14 IC agencies participate in the analysis.
Of course someone lied to the media to claim all 17 agencies supported it!
Of course someone lied to the media to claim all 17 agencies supported it!
Huh, so Brennan was trying to rig the intelligence process to get to a particular result.
Surely he didn't hide contradictory intelligence from them just because it was contradictory to the result he wanted.
Surely he didn't hide contradictory intelligence from them just because it was contradictory to the result he wanted.
Yes, surely a life long federal prosecutor can't understand analytical judgment making, but he can surely find the communications that were used to rig the game. Which is what is most important.
I wonder if any of the intelligence officials involved in torture, murdering detainees, & covering it up are also targets in the new investigation of intelligence officials who don't want to cooperate again...
We know from previous leaks, that only AFTER Trump won the election, that the CIA & others suddenly found evidence to support the conclusion that Russia wanted him to win. Would hate to be the person who planted that evidence into the intelligence community...
Now we get to the crux of the matter, Brennan's secret source in Moscow. The source that fed the information on Putin's intent to Brennan. A source so compromised, that Brennan removed his reporting from the PDB because it would not be deemed credible.
For more on the PDB issue, check here.
Brennan's source was so weak, probably a double agent for Russia. The Russians let him emigrate to the US & he lived under his real name in Virginia.
It looks like the CIA's entire network in Moscow got burned trying desperately to find fake intelligence linking Trump to Putin.
Of course he was a double agent, and he told Brennan the exact story he needed to influence the election.
And Brennan knew his source was unreliable or his information would have been vetted & in the PDB, not delivered to Obama in a brown wrapper. It was #IntelPorn not intel.
And Brennan knew his source was unreliable or his information would have been vetted & in the PDB, not delivered to Obama in a brown wrapper. It was #IntelPorn not intel.
Of course the only time the Obama Admin wanted to mask American persons was when it would allow the NSA & FBI to debunk the CIA's analysis. Then they can't be unmasked! Ridiculous.
Well this looks interesting, an allied intel service found hacked US emails from the State Dept & White House on a Russian government server.
I wonder who might have had an unsecured server that the Russians hacked?
Hillary or the Awans?
I wonder who might have had an unsecured server that the Russians hacked?
Hillary or the Awans?
But the Obama WH blocked the FBI from access to the emails on the grounds that they were covered by Executive Privilege & separation of powers because members of Congress were on it!
Still sounds like it could be either Hillary's or Awan's server...
Still sounds like it could be either Hillary's or Awan's server...
Oh the NYT's says, it is too late to figure out what these bureaucrats meant in their emails. We can't guess their motives & intent so without intent lets stop investigating the crimes!
Now we get into the process of rigging the Intelligence Community Assessment & how the CIA tried to make the FBI fall for the Trump Russia Collusion narrative...
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence & the House Permanent Subcommittee on Intelligence have both found that the intelligence process was rigged. That all the safe guards put in place after Iraqi WMD were ignored to rig the results of the ICA.
Of course you don't interview the most knowledgeable witnesses until you have all the evidence to question them about. What happens when it is revealed that Comey's story implicates both McCabe & Brennan in rigging the intelligence?
@threadreaderapp unroll
@threadreaderapp unroll
