@duty2warn asks: How can the entire GOP leadership forsake its vows to the Constitution?
The answer: They prefer Cult of Leadership to Rule of Law.
GOP leadership ran for office—not to further the aims of liberal democracy—but to subvert it.
Don't be surprised. . .
Sociologist Max Weber has the best explanation. He lists 3 sources of authority:
🔹Traditional (monarchy)
🔹Rational rule of law (democracy)
🔹Charismatic leader
Rule of Law and Charismatic Leader cannot exist together.
Democracy relies on Rule of Law
Cult of leadership rejects Rule of Law.
Cult of Leadership has a lot of appeal. Democracy requires compromise. It’s messy. It’s slow grinding work.
Procedures won't slow him down.
Some people would rather kowtow to a Strongman and curry his favor than deal with the complexity of Rule of Law.
This happens when people don’t think the government governs on their behalf.
asanet.org/sites/default/…
They think these “new” groups (immigrants, minorities, etc.) are displacing them—the “real” Americans.
Exactly what Laura Ingraham explained here:
“Again” in “MAGA” signals reactionism.
Political psychologists Capelos and Katsanidou define reactionism as “a forceful desire to return to the past.”
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.11…
💠When the frontier was open, they could grab land!
💠Before modern rape and sexual harassment laws, they could grab women!
💠Before the New Deal and regulatory agencies, they could cheat, manipulate markets, and fix prices.
🎶Those were the days🎶
To get back to the 1920s, they have to dismantle the federal government and all those agencies put in place since the New Deal.
Or you can take the libertarian positions that all those laws and regulatory agents violate the Constitution.
Now that there's no more frontier, those who reject laws are stuck here and we have to deal with them.
Some GOP leaders are just greedy: You can get richer faster if you ignore the laws.
When my son was in preschool and learned about taking turns, he told me, “I don’t like taking turns. I want all the turns.”
Some people want all the turns.
Mussolini rejected compromise because, in his view, the "strong" don’t compromise.
Newt Gingrich, Ted Cruz, Mitch McConnell and pals reject compromise because they see compromise as impure.
A "purist" doesn’t compromise.
The 2020 election will not be left v. right.
It will not be over issues or policies.
The 2020 election will be about the kind of government we want: Rule of Law or Cult of Leadership.
In 2020, Democracy will be on the ballot.
Why? See my latest on the Demcast blog: demcastusa.com/2020/03/28/no-…
(My blog is acting up at the moment)
"He's a lying crook, but he's our lying crook and his lies help destroy the enemies (Democrats, etc.)"
It increases the polarization. It's an extreme cynicism that leads to nihilism. Nihilism destroys democracy . . .
Liberal democracy right now is being hit from all sides.
I agree⤵️
One mistake I see is people calling the current GOP conservative.
It isn't . . .
And yes, racism underlies what we are witnessing.
The fear that the government isn't legitimate is fueled by fear that "others" are placed ahead of "real" Americans.
The term is from Max Weber, who died in 1920. I used his concepts, so I used his word.
Weber used the term in a highly specialized sense.
"Demagogue" might work better, but Weber nails the concept.
Take the libertarians: They truly believe that the entire federal government is unconstitutional.
Many think they are morally obligated to destroy what is not legal. . .
So they feel morally justified.
Others genuinely believe the Democrats are enemies of America.
When you look at hard numbers, though, those who want democracy to survive outnumber those who don't.
Those who don't have varied reasons.
This is why I say democracy will be on the ballot in 2020.
This will be the issue.