Nearly 10 million people filed unemployment claims in the last two weeks.
The prospect of UI benefits on par with the national median wage likely doesn't help.
My latest for @NRO — nationalreview.com/2020/04/will-p…
Last week, a Fed economist predicted a 32% unemployment rate by the end of the quarter. Now that seems optimistic.
nytimes.com/2020/04/02/bus…
In reality, it was an kludgey compromise driven by the inability of states to easily modify their UI systems—systems run on ancient mainframes with sparsely documented Fortran code. 🤮🤮🤮
To paraphrase @willwilkinson, the economic crisis is subordinate to the epidemiological crisis.
In Germany, f ex., short-time work applications are skyrocketing rather than unemployment. Workers stay attached to employers & govt offsets lost wages.
Only you CAN quit and be eligible under the new rules.
The only groups explicitly ineligible are people who can telework or already have paid leave.
Applications are based on "self-certification."
labor.ny.gov/ui/pdfs/pandem…
We just don’t know.
Studies of totally different UI programs in vastly different recessions don't tell us much.
Bernie says we should be more like Denmark. I agree!!!
That means subsidizing labor demand & payrolls.
nytimes.com/2020/03/28/bus…
The CARES Act funded it at $350 billion when it needs at least $1.2 trillion. Realistically, it should be uncapped.
aei.org/research-produ…
If you are "pro-worker", big UI benefits are good.
Yet grants to firms to give furloughed workers full pay & benefits is even more "pro-worker," but gets construed as "pro-business" b/c of optics.
Seriously—There are more & better ways to compensate workers ordered to stay home than tanking the entire US labor market & bankrupting oodles of businesses.
False dichotomies will be the death of us.